Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Aljobory Wassam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Aljobory Wassam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Aljobory Wassam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Aljobory Wassam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:11 | 42:53 to 38:42 | 69.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:23 to 01:51 | 8.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 04:49 to 04:18 | 8.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 04:33 to 04:08 | 6.9% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:49 to 04:34 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:24 to 04:14 | 2.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Aljobory Wassam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:13 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 04:13 | 04:20 +00:04 | 04:20 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 08:37 | 04:40 -00:10 | 08:40 -00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 13:07 | 02:41 -00:23 | 13:20 -00:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 15:25 | 05:04 +00:04 | 16:01 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 20:33 | 04:29 +00:04 | 21:05 -00:32 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 25:06 | 05:03 +00:02 | 25:34 -00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:40 | 30:11 | 04:45 -01:05 | 30:37 -00:26 |
| Running 5 | 07:19 | 33:51 | 05:11 +02:08 | 35:22 -01:31 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 41:10 | 04:40 +00:09 | 40:33 +00:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 45:59 | 05:04 +00:13 | 45:13 +00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 51:16 | 02:02 +00:21 | 50:17 +00:59 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 53:39 | 05:03 +00:07 | 52:19 +01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:49 | 58:49 | 04:37 +00:12 | 57:22 +01:27 |
| Running 8 | 06:14 | 01:03:38 | 05:31 +00:43 | 01:01:59 +01:39 |
| Wall Balls | 04:43 | 01:09:52 | 05:50 -01:07 | 01:07:30 +02:22 |
| Roxzone | 04:54 | 01:19:21 | 06:01 -01:07 | 01:19:21 |
When analyzing his splits, we can see that his total running time of 00:42:53 was 04:14 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to improve his running performance and speed. However, it's important to note that his best running lap was 00:04:13, which suggests that he has the potential to perform well in running segments.
Overall, Wassam Aljobory's performance in the 2022 Maastricht Hyrox race was commendable. By focusing on improving his running performance, strength in specific segments, and implementing effective race strategies, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tormey Ethan | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:19:35 | |
| Lefebvre Mike | 2024 Paris | 01:19:48 | |
| Hardy Dean | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:51 | |
| Schmidt Maximilian | 2024 Köln | 01:19:41 | |
| Foteinos Ioannis | 2024 Marseille | 01:19:24 | |
| Barr Joe | 2023 Dublin | 01:18:52 | |
| Becker Felix | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:58 | |
| Parker Richard | 2023 Manchester | 01:18:55 | |
| Broadley Stephen | 2024 Glasgow | 01:19:50 | |
| Aegerter Henning J | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:13:07 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:18:35 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:23:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
