Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Whiteford Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Whiteford Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Whiteford Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Whiteford Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:43 | 47:00 to 44:17 | 75.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 05:43 to 05:19 | 11.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 04:49 to 04:30 | 8.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 05:16 to 05:06 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:54 to 04:53 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:52 to 05:52 | 0.0% |
| Whiteford Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 05:16 | 04:33 +00:16 | 04:46 +00:30 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 10:05 | 05:14 +00:19 | 09:19 +00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 15:38 | 03:07 -00:31 | 14:33 +01:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 18:14 | 05:43 +00:01 | 17:40 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 05:16 | 23:58 | 05:21 -00:05 | 23:23 +00:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 29:14 | 05:42 +00:05 | 28:44 +00:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:08 | 35:01 | 05:55 -00:47 | 34:26 +00:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 40:09 | 05:54 +00:01 | 40:21 -00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 46:04 | 04:57 -00:03 | 46:15 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:51 | 50:58 | 05:43 +00:08 | 51:12 -00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 56:49 | 02:20 -00:10 | 56:55 -00:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 58:59 | 05:42 +00:16 | 59:15 -00:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:43 | 01:04:57 | 05:33 +00:10 | 01:04:57 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 07:00 | 01:10:40 | 06:27 +00:33 | 01:10:30 +00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:52 | 01:17:40 | 07:11 -01:19 | 01:16:57 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 08:20 | 01:31:44 | 07:36 +00:44 | 01:31:44 |
In terms of pacing, Andrew should work on maintaining a more consistent speed throughout the race. He started strong with a best running lap time of 00:05:16, but his running times gradually slowed down as the race progressed. This suggests that he may have started too fast and fatigued towards the end.
Based on his splits analysis, Andrew's strengths lie in the sled push, sled pull, burpees broad jump, and farmer's carry. He consistently outperformed the average times in these segments, indicating good strength and technique.
Additionally, Andrew should incorporate interval training and tempo runs into his training routine to improve his speed and endurance. Cross-training activities such as cycling, swimming, or stair climbing will also help improve his overall fitness and endurance.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested exercises and drills into his training routine, Andrew can improve his performance in the specific areas identified and enhance his overall race performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parry Jonathan | 2022 London | 01:32:11 | |
| Bishop Simon | 2023 London | 01:32:03 | |
| Bagoban Mitesh | 2024 London | 01:32:06 | |
| Brossard Frederick | 2023 Paris | 01:32:00 | |
| Mc Clintock Ethan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:31:45 | |
| Fortunato Antony | 2024 Paris | 01:31:58 | |
| Ronan Brian | 2024 Malaga | 01:31:16 | |
| Violi Antonio | 2024 Rimini | 01:32:13 | |
| Moosleitner Stefan | 2018 Hamburg | 01:31:48 | |
| Ogilvie Ian | 2024 Birmingham | 01:31:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:42:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
