Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Worthington Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Worthington Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Worthington Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Worthington Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:40 | 05:30 to 04:50 | 38.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 | 04:50 to 04:31 | 18.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:36 to 04:21 | 14.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:15 to 02:00 | 14.6% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:51 to 04:42 | 8.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 04:46 to 04:42 | 3.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 02:39 to 02:38 | 1.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:06 to 40:06 | 0.0% |
| Worthington Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 05:29 | 04:25 +00:11 | 04:33 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 10:05 | 04:53 -00:20 | 08:58 +01:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 14:38 | 02:52 -00:13 | 13:51 +00:47 |
| Running 3 | 04:43 | 17:17 | 05:19 -00:36 | 16:43 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 22:00 | 04:50 +00:00 | 22:02 -00:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:57 | 26:50 | 05:17 -00:20 | 26:52 -00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 31:47 | 05:10 +00:20 | 32:09 -00:22 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 37:17 | 05:27 -00:16 | 37:19 -00:02 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 42:28 | 04:47 +00:04 | 42:46 -00:18 |
| Running 6 | 04:56 | 47:19 | 05:18 -00:22 | 47:33 -00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 52:15 | 02:09 +00:06 | 52:51 -00:36 |
| Running 7 | 04:56 | 54:30 | 05:18 -00:22 | 55:00 -00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:46 | 59:26 | 04:59 -00:13 | 01:00:18 -00:52 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 01:04:12 | 05:52 -00:28 | 01:05:17 -01:05 |
| Wall Balls | 05:37 | 01:09:36 | 06:17 -00:40 | 01:11:09 -01:33 |
| Roxzone | 08:58 | 01:24:02 | 06:36 +02:22 | 01:24:02 |
Matthew Worthington put up a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. His overall rank of 1262, placing him in the top 30% of 4107 athletes, is worth applauding. Especially impressive is his total running time of 00:40:06, which was 02:04 faster than the average competitor. His running proficiency is further evident in the fact that he achieved his best lap time of 00:04:33. However, the potential for improvement lies in his Roxzone performance, where he was 02:26 slower than the average. This shows he should focus on improving his overall fitness and transition times.
Matthew can implement various strategies to enhance his race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Froom Milan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:24 | |
| Douglas Drew | 2023 Dallas | 01:23:42 | |
| Davies Arron | 2024 London | 01:23:35 | |
| Wylie Mark | 2024 London | 01:23:44 | |
| Taylor Charlie | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:41 | |
| Dexter Liam | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:17 | |
| Voll Markus | 2024 Hamburg | 01:24:18 | |
| Clarkson Matthew | 2022 London | 01:24:18 | |
| Ramirez Rudy | 2024 Dallas | 01:24:01 | |
| Valdini Simone | 2024 Rimini | 01:23:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
