Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stegall Alec's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stegall Alec's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stegall Alec's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stegall Alec's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:06 | 47:21 to 45:15 | 39.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:13 | 06:30 to 05:17 | 23.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:02 | 06:32 to 05:30 | 19.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:37 | 02:55 to 02:18 | 11.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 03:20 to 03:05 | 4.7% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:02 to 04:57 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:39 to 06:39 | 0.0% |
| Stegall Alec | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:40 | 00:00 | 04:52 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 05:40 | 04:34 -00:13 | 04:52 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 10:01 | 05:20 +00:20 | 09:26 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 03:20 | 15:41 | 03:10 +00:10 | 14:46 +00:55 |
| Running 3 | 06:09 | 19:01 | 05:50 +00:19 | 17:56 +01:05 |
| Sled Pull | 06:30 | 25:10 | 05:29 +01:01 | 23:46 +01:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 31:40 | 05:49 +00:06 | 29:15 +02:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:49 | 37:35 | 06:05 -01:16 | 35:04 +02:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:18 | 42:24 | 06:02 +00:16 | 41:09 +01:15 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 48:42 | 04:59 +00:03 | 47:11 +01:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 53:44 | 05:51 -00:02 | 52:10 +01:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:55 | 59:33 | 02:23 +00:32 | 58:01 +01:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:49 | 01:02:28 | 05:50 -00:01 | 01:00:24 +02:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:32 | 01:08:17 | 05:40 +00:52 | 01:06:14 +02:03 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:14:49 | 06:38 -00:33 | 01:11:54 +02:55 |
| Wall Balls | 06:39 | 01:20:54 | 07:26 -00:47 | 01:18:32 +02:22 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:33:48 | 07:50 -01:26 | 01:33:48 |
In terms of the splits analysis, it is evident that Alec had some areas of strength and areas that require improvement. His total running time of 00:47:21 was 02:46 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from focusing on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap was recorded at 00:05:40, showcasing his potential as a strong runner.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques, Alec Stegall can enhance his overall performance in future Hyrox races. With continued dedication and focus on both his strengths and areas of improvement, he has the potential to achieve even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lim Thomas | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:34:13 | |
| Philip Viviyan | 2023 Singapore | 01:34:10 | |
| Munnich Mark | 2023 Dublin | 01:33:58 | |
| Druce Edward | 2022 London | 01:33:27 | |
| Delarue Arnaud | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:33:43 | |
| Shipton Dan | 2024 Marseille | 01:33:53 | |
| Reston Peter | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:03 | |
| Otto Phillip | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:33:19 | |
| Jakupi Miri | 2023 Dallas | 01:33:30 | |
| Sullivan Peter | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:33:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Houston | 01:39:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
