Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 473 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Slatinsky Chazz's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Slatinsky Chazz's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Slatinsky Chazz's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Slatinsky Chazz's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:47 | 35:14 to 32:27 | 53.0% |
| Sled Push | 01:12 | 03:47 to 02:35 | 22.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 05:11 to 04:18 | 16.8% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:19 to 04:10 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 03:59 to 03:53 | 1.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:41 to 01:37 | 1.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 03:45 to 03:41 | 1.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Slatinsky Chazz | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:52 | 00:00 | 03:39 +01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:59 | 04:52 | 04:00 -00:01 | 03:39 +01:13 |
| Running 2 | 04:12 | 08:51 | 03:57 +00:15 | 07:39 +01:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:47 | 13:03 | 03:05 +00:42 | 11:36 +01:27 |
| Running 3 | 04:15 | 16:50 | 04:16 -00:01 | 14:41 +02:09 |
| Sled Pull | 05:11 | 21:05 | 04:53 +00:18 | 18:57 +02:08 |
| Running 4 | 04:22 | 26:16 | 04:17 +00:05 | 23:50 +02:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:59 | 30:38 | 03:24 -00:25 | 28:07 +02:31 |
| Running 5 | 04:26 | 33:37 | 04:22 +00:04 | 31:31 +02:06 |
| Rowing | 04:19 | 38:03 | 04:16 +00:03 | 35:53 +02:10 |
| Running 6 | 04:20 | 42:22 | 04:18 +00:02 | 40:09 +02:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 46:42 | 01:49 -00:08 | 44:27 +02:15 |
| Running 7 | 04:25 | 48:23 | 04:21 +00:04 | 46:16 +02:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:45 | 52:48 | 04:03 -00:18 | 50:37 +02:11 |
| Running 8 | 04:26 | 56:33 | 04:37 -00:11 | 54:40 +01:53 |
| Wall Balls | 04:28 | 01:00:59 | 05:22 -00:54 | 59:17 +01:42 |
| Roxzone | 03:52 | 01:09:11 | 04:32 -00:40 | 01:09:11 |
Based on the splits analysis, Chazz's running performance was slightly slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may benefit from training more on running to improve his overall speed and endurance. Additionally, his total running time of 00:35:14 indicates that he has a balanced profile between running and strength.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to enhance performance in the identified areas, Chazz Slatinsky can continue to improve his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Du Plessis Ashton | 2021 Hamburg | 01:09:26 | |
| Nicola Gil | 2023 Malaga | 01:09:18 | |
| Fitzpatrick Paul | 2024 New York | 01:09:10 | |
| Kruithof Kremer Delphin | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:09:02 | |
| Phelps Liam | 2024 Perth | 01:09:16 | |
| Rouse Laurence | 2024 London | 01:09:05 | |
| Hughes Mike Moa | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:08:48 | |
| Wooster Tyler | 2024 Melbourne | 01:09:40 | |
| Scherbel Clemens | 2023 Warschau | 01:09:32 | |
| Martin Ignacio | 2024 Marseille | 01:09:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Dallas | 01:11:57 | |
| 2023 Dallas | 01:09:33 | |
| 2022 Las Vegas | 01:08:38 | |
| 2021 Dallas | 01:26:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
