Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 984 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Litherland Maryssa's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Litherland Maryssa hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Litherland Maryssa’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Litherland Maryssa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:11 | 53:22 to 48:11 | 76.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:44 | 07:20 to 06:36 | 10.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 03:14 to 02:51 | 5.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 05:26 to 05:05 | 5.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:07 | 05:20 to 05:13 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Litherland Maryssa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:14 | 00:00 | 05:25 +00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 06:14 | 05:14 -00:15 | 05:25 +00:49 |
| Running 2 | 06:06 | 11:13 | 05:48 +00:18 | 10:39 +00:34 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 17:19 | 02:56 +00:18 | 16:27 +00:52 |
| Running 3 | 06:54 | 20:33 | 06:06 +00:48 | 19:23 +01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:40 | 27:27 | 06:14 -01:34 | 25:29 +01:58 |
| Running 4 | 06:46 | 32:07 | 06:10 +00:36 | 31:43 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:20 | 38:53 | 06:55 +00:25 | 37:53 +01:00 |
| Running 5 | 06:30 | 46:13 | 06:20 +00:10 | 44:48 +01:25 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 52:43 | 05:32 -00:14 | 51:08 +01:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:46 | 58:01 | 06:12 +00:34 | 56:40 +01:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 01:04:47 | 02:25 -00:09 | 01:02:52 +01:55 |
| Running 7 | 06:43 | 01:07:03 | 06:11 +00:32 | 01:05:17 +01:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:26 | 01:13:46 | 05:16 +00:10 | 01:11:28 +02:18 |
| Running 8 | 07:23 | 01:19:12 | 06:46 +00:37 | 01:16:44 +02:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:20 | 01:26:35 | 05:32 -00:12 | 01:23:30 +03:05 |
| Roxzone | 04:49 | 01:36:44 | 07:42 -02:53 | 01:36:44 |
From the splits analysis, we can observe that Maryssa's running performance was generally slower than the average. Her running 1, running 2, running 3, running 4, running 6, running 7, and running 8 segments were all slower than the average time. However, it is worth noting that her total running time was significantly faster than average, indicating that she excelled in the running portions of the race.
In summary, Maryssa Litherland had a strong performance in the 2022 Chicago Hyrox race. While there are areas for improvement, such as running segments and burpees broad jump, she should continue to focus on a well-rounded training program that includes interval training, plyometric exercises, hill training, and tempo runs. By implementing these strategies and techniques, she can further enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pedraza Vanessa | 2024 Dallas | 01:36:15 | |
| Lewis Ashley | 2023 Malaga | 01:36:56 | |
| Engel Sandra | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:26 | |
| Bates Natalie | 2022 London | 01:36:26 | |
| Niedzielski Katia | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:36:24 | |
| Davies Megan | 2019 Miami | 01:36:34 | |
| Shafer Natasha | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:31 | |
| Fox Nicki | 2023 London | 01:36:29 | |
| Cowe Robyn | 2024 Brisbane | 01:36:36 | |
| Pérez Río Josefina | 2023 Bilbao | 01:36:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:37:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
