Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Osseweijer Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Osseweijer Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Osseweijer Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Osseweijer Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 06:05 to 05:09 | 29.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 05:22 to 04:45 | 19.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 06:43 to 06:14 | 15.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:25 | 04:50 to 04:25 | 13.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 03:06 to 02:47 | 9.8% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 05:04 to 04:46 | 9.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 05:02 to 04:57 | 2.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:09 to 02:05 | 2.1% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:01 to 42:01 | 0.0% |
| Osseweijer Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:44 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 03:44 | 04:28 +00:22 | 04:42 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 08:34 | 05:02 +00:10 | 09:10 -00:36 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 13:46 | 02:57 +00:09 | 14:12 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:18 | 16:52 | 05:29 -00:11 | 17:09 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 22:10 | 05:02 +00:20 | 22:38 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 27:32 | 05:28 -00:11 | 27:40 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:05 | 32:49 | 05:26 +00:39 | 33:08 -00:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 38:54 | 05:39 -00:05 | 38:34 +00:20 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 44:28 | 04:52 +00:12 | 44:13 +00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 49:32 | 05:30 +00:00 | 49:05 +00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 55:02 | 02:13 -00:04 | 54:35 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 57:11 | 05:28 +00:00 | 56:48 +00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:02 | 01:02:39 | 05:13 -00:11 | 01:02:16 +00:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:02 | 01:07:41 | 06:07 -00:05 | 01:07:29 +00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 06:43 | 01:13:43 | 06:38 +00:05 | 01:13:36 +00:07 |
| Roxzone | 06:58 | 01:27:16 | 07:02 -00:04 | 01:27:16 |
Mark Osseweijer delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank within the top 37% of competitors and ranking 11th in his age group, reflecting his strong competitive edge among peers. His total running time was notably faster than average, suggesting a runner's profile, although he effectively maintained a hybrid fitness level. The initial running segments indicate he started at a quick pace, contributing to his overall strong running performance. However, there is room for improvement in strength-based exercises and transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Griffith David | 2024 Sydney | 01:26:50 | |
| Roberts Joe | 2022 London | 01:26:49 | |
| Chia Chek Wei | 2024 Singapore | 01:27:08 | |
| Chenel Hugo | 2024 Marseille | 01:27:37 | |
| Klingseis Johannes | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:27:23 | |
| Salfus Liam | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:00 | |
| Zeng Gordon | 2024 Brisbane | 01:27:20 | |
| Bryan Matt | 2024 Paris | 01:26:48 | |
| Singh Bikram | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:46 | |
| Craven Jayton | 2023 Melbourne | 01:26:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:37:40 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:32:43 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
