Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lamont Alan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lamont Alan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lamont Alan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lamont Alan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:05 | 08:18 to 06:13 | 39.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:44 | 08:26 to 06:42 | 33.0% |
| Sled Push | 01:03 | 04:32 to 03:29 | 20.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 06:19 to 05:57 | 7.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:35 to 02:34 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:53 to 07:53 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:06 to 46:06 | 0.0% |
| Lamont Alan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:08 | 00:00 | 05:13 +00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 06:08 | 04:42 -00:12 | 05:13 +00:55 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 10:38 | 05:43 -00:23 | 09:55 +00:43 |
| Sled Push | 04:32 | 15:58 | 03:30 +01:02 | 15:38 +00:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 20:30 | 06:17 -00:43 | 19:08 +01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 06:19 | 26:04 | 06:04 +00:15 | 25:25 +00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 32:23 | 06:16 -00:44 | 31:29 +00:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:26 | 37:55 | 06:57 +01:29 | 37:45 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:29 | 46:21 | 06:32 -01:03 | 44:42 +01:39 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 51:50 | 05:12 -00:11 | 51:14 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 56:51 | 06:21 -00:38 | 56:26 +00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:35 | 01:02:34 | 02:36 -00:01 | 01:02:47 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 01:05:09 | 06:20 -00:30 | 01:05:23 -00:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:18 | 01:10:59 | 06:25 +01:53 | 01:11:43 -00:44 |
| Running 8 | 06:32 | 01:19:17 | 07:28 -00:56 | 01:18:08 +01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 07:53 | 01:25:49 | 08:21 -00:28 | 01:25:36 +00:13 |
| Roxzone | 09:24 | 01:42:58 | 09:01 +00:23 | 01:42:58 |
Alan Lamont, competing in the HYROX 60-64 age group, put up a commendable performance at the Birmingham 2024 event. Ranking in the top 55% of all athletes and top 38% within his age group, Alan demonstrated his fitness with a total running time that was significantly faster than the average – by 04:17 minutes to be precise. This indicates that Alan is more of a runner, excelling in the running portions of the race.
However, the beginning of the race appeared to be a bit of a struggle. The first running segment was slower than average, indicating a slow start. As the race progressed, Alan picked up pace and maintained a faster than average time in the subsequent running segments. This suggests that Alan could work on his initial pacing to ensure a stronger start.
Based on the analysis, Alan should consider the following strategies to improve his race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mccluskey Luke | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:17 | |
| Biggs Adam | 2023 London | 01:43:17 | |
| Delolme Quentin | 2023 Paris | 01:42:35 | |
| Van Geelen Jan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:42:28 | |
| Porsch Mattias | 2021 Berlin | 01:43:19 | |
| Drozdowski Alex | 2024 Manchester | 01:43:14 | |
| Fishburn Matt | 2024 London | 01:43:03 | |
| Kocoglu Oguz | 2022 München | 01:43:08 | |
| Clark Ryan | 2024 Houston | 01:43:13 | |
| Mccutcheon Connor | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:37:17 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:44:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
