Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hoogerdijk Rutger's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hoogerdijk Rutger's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hoogerdijk Rutger's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hoogerdijk Rutger's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:52 | 52:52 to 47:00 | 86.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 08:19 to 07:32 | 11.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:08 to 05:03 | 1.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:31 to 02:26 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:53 to 02:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:55 to 05:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Hoogerdijk Rutger | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:39 | 00:00 | 05:03 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 05:39 | 04:38 -00:09 | 05:03 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 06:02 | 10:08 | 05:30 +00:32 | 09:41 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 16:10 | 03:17 -00:24 | 15:11 +00:59 |
| Running 3 | 06:21 | 19:03 | 06:01 +00:20 | 18:28 +00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 25:24 | 05:45 -00:43 | 24:29 +00:55 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 30:26 | 06:02 +00:27 | 30:14 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:55 | 36:55 | 06:29 -00:34 | 36:16 +00:39 |
| Running 5 | 06:38 | 42:50 | 06:16 +00:22 | 42:45 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 49:28 | 05:07 +00:01 | 49:01 +00:27 |
| Running 6 | 06:43 | 54:36 | 06:05 +00:38 | 54:08 +00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 01:01:19 | 02:27 +00:04 | 01:00:13 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 06:55 | 01:03:50 | 06:04 +00:51 | 01:02:40 +01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:07 | 01:10:45 | 06:04 -01:57 | 01:08:44 +02:01 |
| Running 8 | 08:07 | 01:14:52 | 07:01 +01:06 | 01:14:48 +00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 08:19 | 01:22:59 | 07:51 +00:28 | 01:21:49 +01:10 |
| Roxzone | 06:51 | 01:38:02 | 08:22 -01:31 | 01:38:02 |
In terms of his profile, Rutger's total running time of 00:52:52 indicates that he has a stronger running profile compared to the average finisher. This suggests that he should focus on maintaining and improving his running abilities to gain an advantage in future races. However, it is worth noting that his total running time was 06:56 slower than the average, indicating that there is room for improvement in this area.
In conclusion, Rutger Hoogerdijk has shown a strong performance in the 2022 Amsterdam Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running segments, particularly in the areas where he lost the most time, Rutger can enhance his overall performance. Incorporating specific training strategies, such as interval training, strength training, and efficient transitions, can help Rutger reach his full potential in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sánchez Samuel | 2023 Barcelona | 01:37:52 | |
| Argentino Mattia | 2024 Milan | 01:37:53 | |
| Daz Esteban Luis | 2023 Madrid | 01:38:16 | |
| Harris Rob | 2024 Dallas | 01:38:02 | |
| Hon Ian | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:37:53 | |
| Feehan Brendan | 2023 Dublin | 01:38:01 | |
| Rogers Andrew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:20 | |
| Dalem Eddy | 2023 Köln | 01:37:36 | |
| Garcia Jorge | 2024 Anaheim | 01:37:48 | |
| Snow Barrie | 2022 London | 01:38:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Maastricht | 01:44:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
