Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Singapore using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ang Glenn's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ang Glenn's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ang Glenn's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ang Glenn's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:45 | 51:37 to 45:52 | 70.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:38 | 07:01 to 05:23 | 20.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 03:45 to 03:09 | 7.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:31 to 02:20 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Ang Glenn | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:56 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:56 | 04:35 -00:10 | 04:58 +00:58 |
| Running 2 | 06:05 | 10:21 | 05:24 +00:41 | 09:33 +00:48 |
| Sled Push | 03:45 | 16:26 | 03:12 +00:33 | 14:57 +01:29 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 20:11 | 05:51 +00:10 | 18:09 +02:02 |
| Sled Pull | 07:01 | 26:12 | 05:31 +01:30 | 24:00 +02:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 33:13 | 05:51 +00:16 | 29:31 +03:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:45 | 39:20 | 06:14 -02:29 | 35:22 +03:58 |
| Running 5 | 06:39 | 43:05 | 06:05 +00:34 | 41:36 +01:29 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 49:44 | 05:02 -00:16 | 47:41 +02:03 |
| Running 6 | 06:28 | 54:30 | 05:54 +00:34 | 52:43 +01:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 01:00:58 | 02:25 +00:06 | 58:37 +02:21 |
| Running 7 | 06:36 | 01:03:29 | 05:53 +00:43 | 01:01:02 +02:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 01:10:05 | 05:51 -01:43 | 01:06:55 +03:10 |
| Running 8 | 07:49 | 01:14:13 | 06:48 +01:01 | 01:12:46 +01:27 |
| Wall Balls | 05:13 | 01:22:02 | 07:31 -02:18 | 01:19:34 +02:28 |
| Roxzone | 08:05 | 01:35:12 | 08:07 -00:02 | 01:35:12 |
Pacing and Profile:
Glenn's total running time of 00:51:37 was 06:41 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time to decrease the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:56 indicates that he has the potential to be a strong runner. However, his overall running performance was slower than average, indicating that he could benefit from additional running training.
In conclusion, Glenn Ang had a strong performance in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and improved pacing, Glenn can work towards improving his running performance and decreasing his time spent in the roxzone. With consistent training and race strategies in place, Glenn has the potential to achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kalinowski Adam | 2024 Poznan | 01:35:35 | |
| Dia Tobias | 2022 Essen | 01:35:12 | |
| Villani Antonio | 2024 Turin | 01:35:24 | |
| De Dreu Reyn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:51 | |
| King Martyn | 2023 Barcelona | 01:34:56 | |
| Chia David | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:35:41 | |
| Lloyd Adrian | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:48 | |
| Baudic Edouard | 2024 Marseille | 01:35:19 | |
| Jähnichen Andreas | 2018 Hamburg | 01:34:53 | |
| Butron Rua Pablo | 2023 Barcelona | 01:35:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
