Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Parker Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Parker Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Parker Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Parker Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:14 | 47:42 to 44:28 | 62.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:45 | 07:06 to 05:21 | 33.8% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:00 to 04:54 | 1.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 06:55 to 06:49 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Parker Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:18 | 00:00 | 04:50 +02:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 07:18 | 04:33 -00:06 | 04:50 +02:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 11:45 | 05:18 -00:09 | 09:23 +02:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 16:54 | 03:08 -00:53 | 14:41 +02:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 19:09 | 05:47 -00:27 | 17:49 +01:20 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 24:29 | 05:23 -00:47 | 23:36 +00:53 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 29:05 | 05:46 -00:12 | 28:59 +00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:34 | 34:39 | 06:00 -00:26 | 34:45 -00:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 40:13 | 05:57 +00:00 | 40:45 -00:32 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 46:10 | 04:58 +00:02 | 46:42 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 51:10 | 05:48 -00:05 | 51:40 -00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 56:53 | 02:21 -00:13 | 57:28 -00:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 59:01 | 05:46 -00:02 | 59:49 -00:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:06 | 01:04:45 | 05:36 +01:30 | 01:05:35 -00:50 |
| Running 8 | 06:59 | 01:11:51 | 06:33 +00:26 | 01:11:11 +00:40 |
| Wall Balls | 06:55 | 01:18:50 | 07:14 -00:19 | 01:17:44 +01:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:32:44 | 07:46 -00:41 | 01:32:44 |
Ian Parker delivered a commendable performance, finishing in the top 42% overall and achieving 4th in his age group at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race. His strengths were evident in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Burpees Broad Jump, where he consistently outperformed the average. However, his overall running time was slower than average by 1:34, suggesting a need for improved running efficiency. His pacing shows a conservative start in Running 1, which was significantly slower than average, but his performance improved in subsequent running segments. This indicates a potential for better pacing strategy. Ian's overall profile leans slightly towards strength, considering his running time was slower than average, while he excelled in most strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spinosa Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:14 | |
| Seifert Mota Blaycker | 2024 Taipei | 01:32:16 | |
| Stieber Christian | 2022 Basel | 01:33:00 | |
| Pope Brian | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:33:07 | |
| Nicholls Ian | 2024 London | 01:32:36 | |
| Gillmann Tim | 2023 Köln | 01:32:39 | |
| Cox Thomas | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:56 | |
| Brinkhof Max | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:32:21 | |
| Pagnoncelli Giuseppe | 2024 Milan | 01:32:51 | |
| Shanks Tyler | 2022 Chicago | 01:32:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
