Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hogan Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hogan Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hogan Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hogan Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:22 | 07:39 to 05:17 | 57.3% |
| Run Total | 01:13 | 44:04 to 42:51 | 29.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 | 03:08 to 02:50 | 7.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:18 to 02:07 | 4.4% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:51 to 04:48 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:27 to 04:26 | 0.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Hogan Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 04:43 -00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:46 | 04:29 -00:02 | 04:43 -00:57 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 08:13 | 05:06 +00:19 | 09:12 -00:59 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 13:38 | 02:59 +00:09 | 14:18 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 16:46 | 05:33 +00:04 | 17:17 -00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 04:10 | 22:23 | 05:05 -00:55 | 22:50 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 26:33 | 05:32 -00:09 | 27:55 -01:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:39 | 31:56 | 05:37 +02:02 | 33:27 -01:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 39:35 | 05:43 +00:22 | 39:04 +00:31 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 45:40 | 04:52 -00:01 | 44:47 +00:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 50:31 | 05:34 +00:24 | 49:39 +00:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 56:29 | 02:15 +00:03 | 55:13 +01:16 |
| Running 7 | 06:06 | 58:47 | 05:33 +00:33 | 57:28 +01:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:51 | 01:04:53 | 05:21 -01:30 | 01:03:01 +01:52 |
| Running 8 | 05:48 | 01:08:44 | 06:13 -00:25 | 01:08:22 +00:22 |
| Wall Balls | 05:15 | 01:14:32 | 06:48 -01:33 | 01:14:35 -00:03 |
| Roxzone | 08:51 | 01:28:30 | 07:07 +01:44 | 01:28:30 |
In the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, athlete Mark Hogan showed an impressive overall performance, finishing in the top 29% of all athletes and in the top 33% of his age group. His total running time was faster than the average, indicating a stronger running profile. His pacing in the first four running segments was quicker than average, however, he seemed to have started too fast as his running time decreased in subsequent segments. Mark excelled in strength-related segments such as sled pull, sandbag lunges, and wall balls, indicating a hybrid strength and running profile.
Mark should consider implementing the following strategies to enhance his overall performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Dulm Phil | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:39 | |
| Willemse Morne | 2024 Cape Town | 01:28:18 | |
| Saponaro Moreno | 2024 Turin | 01:28:29 | |
| Morsche Julian | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:28:38 | |
| Treanor Liam | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:57 | |
| Morgan James | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:28:42 | |
| Molhant Théo | 2024 Marseille | 01:28:59 | |
| Schneider Johann | 2023 München | 01:28:51 | |
| Garbacz Kamil | 2024 Katowice | 01:28:04 | |
| Agius Clifford | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
