Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:16 (From 45:03 to 39:47) | 86.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 (From 02:11 to 01:55) | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 (From 04:30 to 04:17) | 3.5% |
| Rowing | 00:13 (From 04:50 to 04:37) | 3.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:09 (From 05:44 to 05:35) | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:10 to 02:10) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 03:54 to 03:54) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 03:39 to 03:39) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:38 to 03:38) | 0.0% |
| Martins Lopes Tavares Helder | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:49 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 03:49 | 04:23 +00:07 | 04:29 -00:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 08:19 | 04:46 +00:28 | 08:52 -00:33 |
| Sled Push | 02:10 | 13:33 | 02:46 -00:36 | 13:38 -00:05 |
| Running 3 | 06:31 | 15:43 | 05:10 +01:21 | 16:24 -00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 03:54 | 22:14 | 04:40 -00:46 | 21:34 +00:40 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 26:08 | 05:08 +00:53 | 26:14 -00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:39 | 32:09 | 04:58 -01:19 | 31:22 +00:47 |
| Running 5 | 06:48 | 35:48 | 05:17 +01:31 | 36:20 -00:32 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 42:36 | 04:43 +00:07 | 41:37 +00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 47:26 | 05:11 +00:32 | 46:20 +01:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 53:09 | 02:05 +00:06 | 51:31 +01:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 55:20 | 05:08 +00:06 | 53:36 +01:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:38 | 01:00:34 | 04:49 -01:11 | 58:44 +01:50 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:04:12 | 05:40 +00:06 | 01:03:33 +00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 05:44 | 01:09:58 | 06:06 -00:22 | 01:09:13 +00:45 |
| Roxzone | 06:06 | 01:21:40 | 06:21 -00:15 | 01:21:40 |
Splits Analysis:
- Running 1: Helder performed exceptionally well in this segment, completing it in 00:03:49, which was 00:29 faster than average.
- Ski Erg: Helder's performance in this segment was slightly slower than average, with a time of 00:04:30, being 00:11 slower than average.
- Running 2: Helder lagged behind the average in this segment, completing it in 00:05:14, which was 00:30 slower than average.
- Sled Push: Helder demonstrated a strong performance in this segment, finishing it in 00:02:10, which was 00:56 faster than average.
- Running 3: Helder struggled in this segment, taking 00:06:31 to complete it, which was 01:18 slower than average.
- Sled Pull: Helder excelled in this segment, finishing it in 00:03:54, which was 01:08 faster than average.
- Running 4: Helder faced some difficulty in this segment, completing it in 00:06:01, which was 00:52 slower than average.
- Burpees Broad Jump: Helder performed well in this segment, finishing it in 00:03:39, which was 00:57 faster than average.
- Running 5: Helder struggled in this segment, completing it in 00:06:48, which was 01:32 slower than average.
- Rowing: Helder's performance in this segment was slightly slower than average, with a time of 00:04:50, being 00:11 slower than average.
- Running 6: Helder faced some difficulty in this segment, completing it in 00:05:43, which was 00:32 slower than average.
- Farmers Carry: Helder performed well in this segment, finishing it in 00:02:11, which was 00:02 slower than average.
- Running 7: Helder faced some difficulty in this segment, completing it in 00:05:14, which was 00:05 slower than average.
- Sandbag Lunges: Helder demonstrated a strong performance in this segment, finishing it in 00:03:38, which was 01:09 faster than average.
- Running 8: Helder performed well in this segment, finishing it in 00:05:46, which was 00:01 faster than average.
- Wall Balls: Helder performed well in this segment, finishing it in 00:05:44, which was 00:24 faster than average.
- Roxzone: Helder completed the transition zones in a timely manner, finishing it in 00:06:06, which was 00:01 faster than average.
By implementing these training strategies and race strategies, Helder Martins Lopes Tavares can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races and continue to improve his overall rank and race times.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debernardi Michele | 2024 Turin | 01:21:40 | |
| Böttcher Dirk | 2024 Hamburg | 01:21:30 | |
| Gallagher Calum | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:18 | |
| Berger Christian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:21:28 | |
| Neumann Benjamin | 2023 Miami | 01:22:04 | |
| Van Der Velde Kars | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:52 | |
| Oyebola Kehinde | 2024 London | 01:21:53 | |
| Chui Ronald | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:09 | |
| Boiteau Thomas | 2024 Taipei | 01:21:19 | |
| Hendry James | 2023 Dublin | 01:21:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam Gotschin Fernando, Martins Lopes Tavares Helder | 01:06:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Martins Lopes Tavares Helder
