Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Maastricht European Championships using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Dael Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Dael Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Dael Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Dael Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:42 | 07:07 to 05:25 | 33.3% |
| Run Total | 01:28 | 40:32 to 39:04 | 28.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:40 | 02:32 to 01:52 | 13.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:27 | 04:39 to 04:12 | 8.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 04:34 to 04:15 | 6.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:35 to 02:26 | 2.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 04:30 to 04:22 | 2.6% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:42 to 04:35 | 2.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 04:31 to 04:25 | 2.0% |
| Van Dael Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:13 | 00:00 | 04:22 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 05:13 | 04:21 +00:13 | 04:22 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 09:47 | 04:42 -00:09 | 08:43 +01:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 14:20 | 02:42 -00:07 | 13:25 +00:55 |
| Running 3 | 05:02 | 16:55 | 05:05 -00:03 | 16:07 +00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 21:57 | 04:32 +00:07 | 21:12 +00:45 |
| Running 4 | 04:56 | 26:36 | 05:04 -00:08 | 25:44 +00:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:31 | 31:32 | 04:47 -00:16 | 30:48 +00:44 |
| Running 5 | 05:08 | 36:03 | 05:12 -00:04 | 35:35 +00:28 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 41:11 | 04:40 +00:02 | 40:47 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 04:54 | 45:53 | 05:05 -00:11 | 45:27 +00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 50:47 | 02:02 +00:30 | 50:32 +00:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 53:19 | 05:04 +00:00 | 52:34 +00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:30 | 58:23 | 04:40 -00:10 | 57:38 +00:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:02:53 | 05:32 +00:13 | 01:02:18 +00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 07:07 | 01:08:38 | 05:53 +01:14 | 01:07:50 +00:48 |
| Roxzone | 04:10 | 01:19:48 | 06:05 -01:55 | 01:19:48 |
Based on the splits analysis, Chris performed exceptionally well in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges segments, where he was faster than the average time. His best running lap was also impressive, completing it in 00:04:33. However, he struggled in the Wall Balls, Running 1, and Farmers Carry segments, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
In conclusion, Chris Van Dael had a commendable performance in the HYROX race, with strengths in certain segments and areas for improvement in others. By focusing on targeted training strategies, such as interval training, strength exercises, and optimizing transitions, he can further enhance his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rodriguez Ruiz Jose Luis | 2023 Madrid | 01:19:54 | |
| Guillou Sylvain | 2024 Paris | 01:20:14 | |
| Prentice Craig | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:03 | |
| Grove Alex | 2023 London | 01:19:39 | |
| Tsie Giorgio | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:30 | |
| Labach Jonathan | 2021 Dallas | 01:19:20 | |
| Lilienberg Johan | 2023 Malmö | 01:19:47 | |
| Maury Quentin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:19:39 | |
| Skidmore Elliot | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:10 | |
| Tennant Ian | 2023 London | 01:19:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:18:42 | |
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:24:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
