Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Novakov Oliver's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Novakov Oliver's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Novakov Oliver's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Novakov Oliver's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:28 | 53:01 to 48:33 | 77.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:30 | 07:08 to 06:38 | 8.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:25 | 05:07 to 04:42 | 7.2% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 05:32 to 05:08 | 6.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:34 to 02:33 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:10 to 03:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:50 to 05:50 | 0.0% |
| Novakov Oliver | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:00 | 00:00 | 05:09 -00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 05:00 | 04:41 +00:26 | 05:09 -00:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:48 | 10:07 | 05:40 +00:08 | 09:50 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 15:55 | 03:30 -00:20 | 15:30 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 06:42 | 19:05 | 06:16 +00:26 | 19:00 +00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:13 | 25:47 | 06:04 -00:51 | 25:16 +00:31 |
| Running 4 | 06:25 | 31:00 | 06:14 +00:11 | 31:20 -00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:08 | 37:25 | 06:46 +00:22 | 37:34 -00:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:30 | 44:33 | 06:31 -00:01 | 44:20 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 05:32 | 51:03 | 05:11 +00:21 | 50:51 +00:12 |
| Running 6 | 06:33 | 56:35 | 06:20 +00:13 | 56:02 +00:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:34 | 01:03:08 | 02:36 -00:02 | 01:02:22 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 06:20 | 01:05:42 | 06:18 +00:02 | 01:04:58 +00:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 01:12:02 | 06:18 -00:27 | 01:11:16 +00:46 |
| Running 8 | 09:45 | 01:17:53 | 07:25 +02:20 | 01:17:34 +00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 05:50 | 01:27:38 | 08:14 -02:24 | 01:24:59 +02:39 |
| Roxzone | 08:45 | 01:42:07 | 08:54 -00:09 | 01:42:07 |
Segment Analysis:
- Running 1: Oliver's time of 00:05:00 was only 00:02 slower than the average, indicating a solid performance.
- Ski Erg: Oliver's time of 00:05:07 was 00:29 slower than the average, suggesting that he could improve his performance in this segment.
- Running 2: Oliver's time of 00:05:48 was 00:11 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement.
- Sled Push: Oliver's time of 00:03:10 was 00:44 faster than the average, highlighting this segment as a strength for him.
- Running 3: Oliver's time of 00:06:42 was 00:25 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement.
- Sled Pull: Oliver's time of 00:05:13 was 01:08 faster than the average, highlighting this segment as a strength for him.
- Running 4: Oliver's time of 00:06:25 was 00:10 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement.
- Burpees Broad Jump: Oliver's time of 00:07:08 was 00:46 slower than the average, suggesting that he could improve his performance in this segment.
- Running 5: Oliver's time of 00:06:30 was 00:02 faster than the average, indicating a solid performance.
- Rowing: Oliver's time of 00:05:32 was 00:26 slower than the average, suggesting that he could improve his performance in this segment.
- Running 6: Oliver's time of 00:06:33 was 00:16 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement.
- Farmers Carry: Oliver's time of 00:02:34 was 00:05 faster than the average, highlighting this segment as a strength for him.
- Running 7: Oliver's time of 00:06:20 was 00:03 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement.
- Sandbag Lunges: Oliver's time of 00:05:51 was 00:25 faster than the average, highlighting this segment as a strength for him.
- Running 8: Oliver's time of 00:09:45 was 02:18 slower than the average, indicating significant room for improvement.
- Wall Balls: Oliver's time of 00:05:50 was 02:25 faster than the average, highlighting this segment as a strength for him.
- Roxzone: Oliver's time of 00:08:45 was 00:13 faster than the average, suggesting that he transitioned well between the exercise zones.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing specific training strategies and techniques, Oliver Novakov can enhance his performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Torres Guerrero Federico | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:14 | |
| Vacas Arquero Pablo | 2023 Madrid | 01:42:25 | |
| Robertson Michael | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:41:42 | |
| Connan Nicholas | 2024 Perth | 01:42:20 | |
| Brüggmann Dennis | 2019 Hamburg | 01:42:08 | |
| Götze Rene | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:41:57 | |
| Kemper Mike | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:41:38 | |
| Rusak Dariusz | 2024 Gdansk | 01:42:26 | |
| Barkan Richard | 2022 New York | 01:42:04 | |
| Scholz Sascha | 2024 Hamburg | 01:42:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
