Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Laird Kyle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Laird Kyle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Laird Kyle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Laird Kyle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:23 | 07:03 to 04:40 | 35.0% |
| Run Total | 02:21 | 44:10 to 41:49 | 34.6% |
| Sled Push | 01:35 | 04:18 to 02:43 | 23.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:20 | 05:22 to 05:02 | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:12 to 02:03 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:42 to 05:42 | 0.0% |
| Laird Kyle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 04:37 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 04:23 | 04:27 -00:18 | 04:37 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 08:32 | 04:59 +00:21 | 09:04 -00:32 |
| Sled Push | 04:18 | 13:52 | 02:55 +01:23 | 14:03 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 18:10 | 05:25 +00:24 | 16:58 +01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 07:03 | 23:59 | 04:58 +02:05 | 22:23 +01:36 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 31:02 | 05:24 +00:38 | 27:21 +03:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:22 | 37:04 | 05:19 +00:03 | 32:45 +04:19 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 42:26 | 05:34 +00:33 | 38:04 +04:22 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 48:33 | 04:49 -00:08 | 43:38 +04:55 |
| Running 6 | 05:55 | 53:14 | 05:26 +00:29 | 48:27 +04:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 59:09 | 02:11 +00:01 | 53:53 +05:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:43 | 01:01:21 | 05:24 +00:19 | 56:04 +05:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:50 | 01:07:04 | 05:06 -01:16 | 01:01:28 +05:36 |
| Running 8 | 04:54 | 01:10:54 | 06:01 -01:07 | 01:06:34 +04:20 |
| Wall Balls | 05:42 | 01:15:48 | 06:33 -00:51 | 01:12:35 +03:13 |
| Roxzone | 04:40 | 01:26:02 | 06:54 -02:14 | 01:26:02 |
Kyle Laird had a strong performance in the HYROX race in Los Angeles, finishing in the top 14% of all athletes and the top 15% in his age group. His overall time of 01:26:02 is commendable, but there are areas where he can improve to further enhance his performance.
In terms of his profile, Kyle's total running time of 00:44:10 indicates that he has a strong running ability. However, it is worth noting that his total running time was 02:31 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he could benefit from focusing on improving his overall fitness and transition time.
Overall, Kyle Laird has demonstrated strong performance in the HYROX race. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transitioning efficiently between segments, and implementing specific training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Burau Eugen | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:25:44 | |
| Vajra Andrea | 2024 Turin | 01:26:10 | |
| De Groot Frank | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:19 | |
| Richards Marvin Lee | 2018 Hamburg | 01:26:19 | |
| Gutteling Niek | 2024 Maastricht | 01:26:27 | |
| Hodgson Lee | 2022 Birmingham | 01:25:54 | |
| Ståhl Eak | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:56 | |
| Willis Brody | 2024 Sydney | 01:25:33 | |
| Becker Stefan | 2023 München | 01:26:18 | |
| Brudermanns Max | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:25:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Los Angeles | 01:37:29 | |
| 2021 New York | 01:24:32 | |
| 2021 Dallas | 01:33:02 | |
| 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:29:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
