Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lightfoot Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lightfoot Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lightfoot Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lightfoot Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:17 | 07:07 to 04:50 | 51.3% |
| Run Total | 01:28 | 42:27 to 40:59 | 33.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 05:24 to 04:42 | 15.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Lightfoot Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 05:12 | 04:25 -00:16 | 04:33 +00:39 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 09:21 | 04:53 +00:07 | 08:58 +00:23 |
| Sled Push | 01:47 | 14:21 | 02:52 -01:05 | 13:51 +00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 16:08 | 05:19 -00:15 | 16:43 -00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 21:12 | 04:49 -00:18 | 22:02 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 25:43 | 05:16 +00:00 | 26:51 -01:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:07 | 30:59 | 05:08 +01:59 | 32:07 -01:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 38:06 | 05:26 +00:08 | 37:15 +00:51 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 43:40 | 04:46 -00:06 | 42:41 +00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 48:20 | 05:18 +00:10 | 47:27 +00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 53:48 | 02:09 -00:16 | 52:45 +01:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 55:41 | 05:17 -00:06 | 54:54 +00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:24 | 01:00:52 | 04:58 +00:26 | 01:00:11 +00:41 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:06:16 | 05:51 -00:05 | 01:05:09 +01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:40 | 01:12:02 | 06:16 -01:36 | 01:11:00 +01:02 |
| Roxzone | 07:21 | 01:23:54 | 06:38 +00:43 | 01:23:54 |
Matthew Lightfoot delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race, ranking in the top 26% overall and the top 31% in his age group. His total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating potential for improvement in running. Notably, his strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Wall Balls were performed significantly faster than average, showcasing his strength-oriented profile. However, his pacing during the early running segments suggests a cautious start, potentially indicating a conservative strategy or a need to improve initial pacing. His overall fitness and transition efficiency, as reflected in the Roxzone time, also present areas for enhancement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Kristian | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:57 | |
| Gómez Sáez Marcelino | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:30 | |
| Stearman Aaron | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:30 | |
| Woito Marcus | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:23:55 | |
| Huang Shang Hao Henry | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:23:40 | |
| Van Rooijen Dennis | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:53 | |
| Clark Kai | 2023 Madrid | 01:24:03 | |
| Shadbolt Daniel | 2023 Melbourne | 01:24:07 | |
| Simoes Terence | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:21 | |
| Roblin Leo | 2022 Madrid | 01:23:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
