Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 607 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Go Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Go Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Go Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Go Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:51 | 12:03 to 09:12 | 38.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:23 | 09:57 to 07:34 | 32.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:58 | 08:56 to 06:58 | 26.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:57 to 04:52 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 03:59 to 03:54 | 1.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:42 to 05:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 50:39 to 50:39 | 0.0% |
| Go Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 05:26 -01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 04:23 | 04:50 +00:07 | 05:26 -01:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:48 | 09:20 | 06:06 -00:18 | 10:16 -00:56 |
| Sled Push | 03:59 | 15:08 | 03:55 +00:04 | 16:22 -01:14 |
| Running 3 | 06:29 | 19:07 | 06:54 -00:25 | 20:17 -01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 05:42 | 25:36 | 06:44 -01:02 | 27:11 -01:35 |
| Running 4 | 06:26 | 31:18 | 06:51 -00:25 | 33:55 -02:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:57 | 37:44 | 07:47 +02:10 | 40:46 -03:02 |
| Running 5 | 07:19 | 47:41 | 07:15 +00:04 | 48:33 -00:52 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 55:00 | 05:25 -00:16 | 55:48 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 06:16 | 01:00:09 | 06:59 -00:43 | 01:01:13 -01:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 01:06:25 | 02:46 -00:38 | 01:08:12 -01:47 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 01:08:33 | 06:57 -00:46 | 01:10:58 -02:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:56 | 01:14:44 | 07:13 +01:43 | 01:17:55 -03:11 |
| Running 8 | 07:49 | 01:23:40 | 08:34 -00:45 | 01:25:08 -01:28 |
| Wall Balls | 12:03 | 01:31:29 | 09:30 +02:33 | 01:33:42 -02:13 |
| Roxzone | 09:58 | 01:53:24 | 10:12 -00:14 | 01:53:24 |
Kevin Go has demonstrated an impressive performance at the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event. His overall standing in the top 51% of all athletes and top 52% within his age group is commendable. Kevin's Total running time is 04:32 faster than the average, indicating that he has a strong running profile and his pacing throughout the race was well maintained. This is further emphasized by his performance in the initial running segments (Running 1 to Running 4) where he consistently maintained a faster pace than the average. His speed and endurance in running are clear strengths that have contributed to his overall performance.
For better performance in future races, Kevin should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stumpp Immanuel | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:53:20 | |
| Kaatz Steve | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:53:21 | |
| Blackney Andrew | 2023 Melbourne | 01:53:09 | |
| Williams Jon | 2023 Anaheim | 01:52:59 | |
| Remine Stefano | 2023 Milan | 01:53:54 | |
| Fasciani Fabrizio | 2024 Milan | 01:53:30 | |
| Mcgill Jarlath | 2024 Birmingham | 01:53:08 | |
| Tan Yew Yong | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:53:28 | |
| Marzano Michele | 2024 London | 01:53:08 | |
| Puls Pascal | 2018 Hamburg | 01:53:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
