Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grzywna Grzegorz's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grzywna Grzegorz's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grzywna Grzegorz's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grzywna Grzegorz's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:54 | 37:04 to 34:10 | 57.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:46 | 02:19 to 01:33 | 15.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 03:54 to 03:24 | 9.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:25 | 04:26 to 04:01 | 8.2% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 04:35 to 04:19 | 5.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 03:36 to 03:22 | 4.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:15 to 03:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Grzywna Grzegorz | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:43 | 00:00 | 03:57 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 03:43 | 04:10 +00:16 | 03:57 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:15 | 08:09 | 04:12 +00:03 | 08:07 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 01:51 | 12:24 | 02:26 -00:35 | 12:19 +00:05 |
| Running 3 | 04:40 | 14:15 | 04:28 +00:12 | 14:45 -00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 03:54 | 18:55 | 03:54 +00:00 | 19:13 -00:18 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 22:49 | 04:28 +00:18 | 23:07 -00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:36 | 27:35 | 03:52 -00:16 | 27:35 +00:00 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 31:11 | 04:35 +00:10 | 31:27 -00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 35:56 | 04:26 +00:09 | 36:02 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:38 | 40:31 | 04:30 +00:08 | 40:28 +00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 45:09 | 01:47 +00:32 | 44:58 +00:11 |
| Running 7 | 04:39 | 47:28 | 04:30 +00:09 | 46:45 +00:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:15 | 52:07 | 03:57 -00:42 | 51:15 +00:52 |
| Running 8 | 05:42 | 55:22 | 04:47 +00:55 | 55:12 +00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 04:09 | 01:01:04 | 04:53 -00:44 | 59:59 +01:05 |
| Roxzone | 04:39 | 01:09:44 | 04:52 -00:13 | 01:09:44 |
In terms of his running performance, Grzywna completed the race with a total running time of 00:37:04, which was 02:35 slower than the average. This suggests that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time to enhance his performance in the roxzone.
In conclusion, Grzegorz Grzywna performed well in the HYROX race in Munich but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transition time, and specific segments where he lost time, he can enhance his performance in future races. Implementing the recommended training strategies, techniques, and drills mentioned above will help him improve his overall performance and achieve better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fisher Jake | 2024 London | 01:09:57 | |
| Glackin Paul | 2024 Dublin | 01:09:17 | |
| Lodge Nick | 2023 Glasgow | 01:09:37 | |
| Soh Jeremy | 2024 Singapore | 01:09:50 | |
| McKee Benjamin | 2021 London | 01:10:08 | |
| Ng Darren | 2024 Singapore | 01:09:49 | |
| Kost Benjamin | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:09:20 | |
| O'Regan Simon | 2024 Melbourne | 01:09:26 | |
| Wiskerke Adriaan | 2024 Hamburg | 01:10:09 | |
| Scharfe Paul | 2024 Paris | 01:09:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
