Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Maastricht European Championships using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Asselt Pim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Asselt Pim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Asselt Pim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Asselt Pim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:58 | 52:48 to 48:50 | 61.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:29 | 09:11 to 06:42 | 38.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:28 to 03:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:01 to 08:01 | 0.0% |
| Van Asselt Pim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:32 | 00:00 | 05:12 +01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 06:32 | 04:41 -00:06 | 05:12 +01:20 |
| Running 2 | 06:01 | 11:07 | 05:43 +00:18 | 09:53 +01:14 |
| Sled Push | 03:28 | 17:08 | 03:29 -00:01 | 15:36 +01:32 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 20:36 | 06:17 -00:16 | 19:05 +01:31 |
| Sled Pull | 03:55 | 26:37 | 06:06 -02:11 | 25:22 +01:15 |
| Running 4 | 06:18 | 30:32 | 06:16 +00:02 | 31:28 -00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:11 | 36:50 | 06:54 +02:17 | 37:44 -00:54 |
| Running 5 | 06:33 | 46:01 | 06:32 +00:01 | 44:38 +01:23 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 52:34 | 05:11 -00:23 | 51:10 +01:24 |
| Running 6 | 06:45 | 57:22 | 06:22 +00:23 | 56:21 +01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:47 | 01:04:07 | 02:35 -00:48 | 01:02:43 +01:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:47 | 01:05:54 | 06:19 +00:28 | 01:05:18 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:29 | 01:12:41 | 06:26 -00:57 | 01:11:37 +01:04 |
| Running 8 | 07:55 | 01:18:10 | 07:26 +00:29 | 01:18:03 +00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 08:01 | 01:26:05 | 08:15 -00:14 | 01:25:29 +00:36 |
| Roxzone | 08:45 | 01:42:43 | 08:59 -00:14 | 01:42:43 |
Pacing: Pim's pacing throughout the race was generally consistent, with a few segments where he either lost or gained time compared to the average. This indicates that he maintained a steady effort level, but there is room for improvement in certain areas.
Profile: Pim's total running time of 00:52:48 was slower than the average, suggesting that he could benefit from focusing more on his running training. While he performed well in some strength-based segments, such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, he can aim to improve his overall fitness and transition time to reduce the time spent in the roxzone.
Overall, Pim Van Asselt performed well in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, refining his strength-based segments, and implementing effective race strategies, he can continue to progress and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Müller Eugen | 2022 München | 01:43:09 | |
| Grimes Enda | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:42:32 | |
| Pryluk Doron | 2024 Singapore | 01:42:51 | |
| Dohmen Michael | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:42:50 | |
| Buda Stefan | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:53 | |
| Ometto Emanuele | 2024 Turin | 01:42:45 | |
| Taylor Graham | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:42:32 | |
| Brooks Stuart | 2023 Birmingham | 01:42:27 | |
| Robles Ivan | 2022 Manchester | 01:42:29 | |
| Rabus Matt | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:42:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:41:57 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:11 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:38:11 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
