Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Falzon Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Falzon Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Falzon Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Falzon Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:58 | 07:53 to 04:55 | 55.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:27 | 06:13 to 04:46 | 27.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:34 | 02:35 to 02:01 | 10.7% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 04:55 to 04:43 | 3.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:30 to 04:22 | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:41 to 40:41 | 0.0% |
| Falzon Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:21 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 04:21 | 04:26 +00:04 | 04:35 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:29 | 08:51 | 04:54 -00:25 | 09:01 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:09 | 13:20 | 02:51 -00:42 | 13:55 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 04:51 | 15:29 | 05:21 -00:30 | 16:46 -01:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:27 | 20:20 | 04:52 -00:25 | 22:07 -01:47 |
| Running 4 | 04:56 | 24:47 | 05:20 -00:24 | 26:59 -02:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:53 | 29:43 | 05:15 +02:38 | 32:19 -02:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 37:36 | 05:30 -00:10 | 37:34 +00:02 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 42:56 | 04:48 +00:07 | 43:04 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 47:51 | 05:21 +00:03 | 47:52 -00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:35 | 53:15 | 02:09 +00:26 | 53:13 +00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 55:50 | 05:20 +00:02 | 55:22 +00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:13 | 01:01:12 | 05:02 +01:11 | 01:00:42 +00:30 |
| Running 8 | 06:02 | 01:07:25 | 05:57 +00:05 | 01:05:44 +01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 05:11 | 01:13:27 | 06:25 -01:14 | 01:11:41 +01:46 |
| Roxzone | 06:19 | 01:24:50 | 06:44 -00:25 | 01:24:50 |
Matthew Falzon delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, finishing in the top 28% overall and the top 20% in his age group. His total running time was 2 minutes faster than average, highlighting his proficiency as a runner. This suggests a runner profile, indicating that his strength lies more in running than in strength-based exercises. Notably, Matthew's pacing was consistent, as evidenced by his above-average performance in the initial running segments. However, it appears that he may have started slightly fast, as the first few running segments were significantly faster than average, which could have impacted his efficiency in later strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vella Peter | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:24:30 | |
| Maßen Johannes | 2023 Hamburg | 01:24:51 | |
| Abaclat Andrea | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:52 | |
| Condon Graham | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:32 | |
| Bürkle Jens | 2024 Berlin | 01:24:48 | |
| Lynch Jonathan | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:24:20 | |
| Crepeau Victor | 2024 Milan | 01:24:20 | |
| Lacognata Nicolas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:03 | |
| Benedetti Alessandro | 2023 Valencia | 01:24:56 | |
| Piper Brett | 2024 Perth | 01:25:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:19:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
