Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Doyle Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Doyle Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Doyle Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Doyle Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:40 | 45:29 to 41:49 | 85.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:24 to 02:03 | 8.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 06:14 to 06:06 | 3.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:07 | 04:59 to 04:52 | 2.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:01 | 05:03 to 05:02 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Doyle Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:05 | 00:00 | 04:38 -00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 04:05 | 04:27 -00:17 | 04:38 -00:33 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 08:15 | 04:59 +00:22 | 09:05 -00:50 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 13:36 | 02:56 -00:16 | 14:04 -00:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 16:16 | 05:25 +00:10 | 17:00 -00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 21:51 | 04:59 -00:23 | 22:25 -00:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 26:27 | 05:25 +00:11 | 27:24 -00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 32:03 | 05:20 -00:17 | 32:49 -00:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 37:06 | 05:35 +00:21 | 38:09 -01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 43:02 | 04:49 -00:12 | 43:44 -00:42 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 47:39 | 05:28 +00:28 | 48:33 -00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 53:35 | 02:12 +00:12 | 54:01 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 55:59 | 05:25 +00:33 | 56:13 -00:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:59 | 01:01:57 | 05:07 -00:08 | 01:01:38 +00:19 |
| Running 8 | 07:05 | 01:06:56 | 06:03 +01:02 | 01:06:45 +00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 06:14 | 01:14:01 | 06:33 -00:19 | 01:12:48 +01:13 |
| Roxzone | 06:10 | 01:26:17 | 06:56 -00:46 | 01:26:17 |
Mark Doyle demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 1112 out of 3118 athletes, placing him in the top 35%. Within his age group (25-29), he ranked 242nd, placing him in the top 38%, indicative of strong competitiveness. His overall time was 01:26:17.
Analyzing his pacing strategy, Mark started strong, with his first running segment being 28 seconds faster than average. However, his pace declined progressively in subsequent running segments, which suggests an initial pace that was too fast, leading to fatigue. This is further supported by his 'Total running time' being 2:04 slower than average, indicating a need for enhanced endurance and pacing strategy.
In terms of his profile, Mark appears to have a balanced strength and running capability. His performance in strength-based exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull was consistently above average, pointing towards a well-developed strength profile. However, his slower total running time suggests room for improvement in running endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Niu Wei | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:26:32 | |
| Nicke Peter | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:25:55 | |
| Gobin Antoine | 2023 Paris | 01:25:47 | |
| Cross Martin | 2024 Stockholm | 01:26:34 | |
| Altham Tom | 2023 London | 01:26:44 | |
| Macgregor Colin | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:04 | |
| Hawkins Paul | 2023 Dublin | 01:26:10 | |
| Manzetti Claudius | 2021 Hamburg | 01:26:11 | |
| Zamora Michael | 2023 Anaheim | 01:25:58 | |
| Assefa Betz | 2024 Stockholm | 01:26:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Madrid | 01:31:09 | |
| 2024 Dublin | 01:27:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
