Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 7 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Currie James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Currie James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Currie James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Currie James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 54:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 28:50 | 01:28:29 to 59:39 | 52.8% |
| Sled Pull | 08:27 | 16:19 to 07:52 | 15.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:25 | 17:32 to 09:07 | 15.4% |
| Wall Balls | 07:20 | 18:37 to 11:17 | 13.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:03 | 04:23 to 03:20 | 1.9% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 06:06 to 05:43 | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 04:51 to 04:40 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Currie James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 08:20 | 00:00 | 07:58 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:04 | 08:20 | 05:44 -00:40 | 07:58 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 09:58 | 13:24 | 08:36 +01:22 | 13:42 -00:18 |
| Sled Push | 04:51 | 23:22 | 05:26 -00:35 | 22:18 +01:04 |
| Running 3 | 11:23 | 28:13 | 10:27 +00:56 | 27:44 +00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 16:19 | 39:36 | 10:58 +05:21 | 38:11 +01:25 |
| Running 4 | 12:33 | 55:55 | 11:07 +01:26 | 49:09 +06:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 17:32 | 01:08:28 | 14:04 +03:28 | 01:00:16 +08:12 |
| Running 5 | 11:19 | 01:26:00 | 12:49 -01:30 | 01:14:20 +11:40 |
| Rowing | 06:06 | 01:37:19 | 07:04 -00:58 | 01:27:09 +10:10 |
| Running 6 | 10:56 | 01:43:25 | 12:58 -02:02 | 01:34:13 +09:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:23 | 01:54:21 | 04:12 +00:11 | 01:47:11 +07:10 |
| Running 7 | 12:02 | 01:58:44 | 11:14 +00:48 | 01:51:23 +07:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:31 | 02:10:46 | 10:10 -07:39 | 02:02:37 +08:09 |
| Running 8 | 12:02 | 02:13:17 | 15:25 -03:23 | 02:12:47 +00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 18:37 | 02:25:19 | 13:30 +05:07 | 02:28:12 -02:53 |
| Roxzone | 15:01 | 02:58:49 | 17:07 -02:06 | 02:58:49 |
James Currie's performance at the 2024 Paris Hyrox race demonstrates a well-rounded athlete with strengths in both running and strength exercises. Despite a few challenges, he managed to excel in several areas, with his overall running time being faster than average by 3 seconds. This indicates a potential stronger runner profile. However, his performance in strength exercises like the Ski Erg and Sled Push, where he was faster than average, suggests a balanced athletic profile.
His pacing throughout the race showed a trend of a slower start with the first four running segments being slower than the average time. However, this was followed by an impressive recovery in the latter half, completing Running 5, Running 6, and Running 8 faster than average. The roxzone time was also faster than average, suggesting efficient transitions and rest periods.
There are several areas where James could focus his training to improve his performance:
James could benefit from the following race strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Scrubb Nicholas | 2023 Dallas | 02:58:42 | |
| Tran Nathanlee | 2023 Dallas | 02:58:23 | |
| Currie James | 2024 Paris | 02:58:49 | |
| Taylor Glenn | 2024 New York | 02:58:34 | |
| Manahan Chris | 2024 Anaheim | 02:59:18 | |
| Parham Ray | 2024 Birmingham | 02:58:44 | |
| Marchante Ricardo | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 02:59:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Manchester | 01:59:03 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:53:38 | |
| 2023 Barcelona | 03:49:57 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:39:30 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 03:43:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
