Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 816 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stokkink Nadine's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stokkink Nadine's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stokkink Nadine's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stokkink Nadine's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:06 | 40:40 to 38:34 | 36.0% |
| Sled Push | 01:19 | 03:18 to 01:59 | 22.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:46 | 04:58 to 04:12 | 13.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:37 | 04:12 to 03:35 | 10.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:31 | 04:45 to 04:14 | 8.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:28 | 03:44 to 03:16 | 8.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:42 to 04:39 | 0.9% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Stokkink Nadine | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 04:15 | 04:51 -00:09 | 04:35 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:46 | 08:57 | 04:49 -00:03 | 09:26 -00:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:18 | 13:43 | 02:24 +00:54 | 14:15 -00:32 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 17:01 | 05:03 +00:27 | 16:39 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 22:31 | 04:47 +00:11 | 21:42 +00:49 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 27:29 | 05:04 +00:14 | 26:29 +01:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 32:47 | 04:49 -00:04 | 31:33 +01:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 37:32 | 05:10 +00:16 | 36:22 +01:10 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 42:58 | 05:04 -00:16 | 41:32 +01:26 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 47:46 | 05:06 +00:14 | 46:36 +01:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 53:06 | 01:59 -00:24 | 51:42 +01:24 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 54:41 | 05:04 +00:33 | 53:41 +01:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 01:00:18 | 03:58 +00:14 | 58:45 +01:33 |
| Running 8 | 04:33 | 01:04:30 | 05:22 -00:49 | 01:02:43 +01:47 |
| Wall Balls | 03:44 | 01:09:03 | 03:57 -00:13 | 01:08:05 +00:58 |
| Roxzone | 04:56 | 01:17:33 | 05:31 -00:35 | 01:17:33 |
Nadine's best running lap was 00:04:15, which was 00:10 faster than the average. Her splits analysis shows that she performed above average in the Ski Erg (+00:06), Sled Pull (+00:02), Rowing (+00:13), Farmers Carry (+00:31), Wall Balls (+00:14), and Roxzone (+00:29). However, she lost time in the Sled Push (-00:32), Running 3 (-00:28), Running 5 (-00:17), Running 6 (-00:16), Running 4 (-00:15), and Burpees Broad Jump (-00:13) segments.
In summary, Nadine Stokkink performed exceptionally well in the 2022 Los Angeles HYROX race, ranking in the top 1% overall and top 3% in her age group. To further improve her performance, she should focus on specific areas such as the Sled Push, running segments 3, 5, 6, and 4, as well as the Burpees Broad Jump. By incorporating targeted training strategies and techniques, she can enhance her overall strength, running performance, and transition time. Implementing effective race strategies, including pacing, transition optimization, and mental preparation, will also contribute to her continued success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Orlowski Tina | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:17:47 | |
| Backhouse Kate | 2022 Birmingham | 01:17:36 | |
| Marquardt Wiebke | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:17:31 | |
| Nesbitt Claire | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:17:23 | |
| Miller Nicole | 2023 München | 01:17:57 | |
| Cumings Maddison | 2024 London | 01:17:14 | |
| Annelsdottir Bjarney | 2023 Stockholm | 01:17:36 | |
| Byrne Christie | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:35 | |
| Wiles Stephanie | 2024 Rimini | 01:17:28 | |
| Di Fazio Angela | 2024 Rimini | 01:17:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:29:49 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:13 | |
| 2022 Las Vegas | 01:23:47 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
