Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 576 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Czerwinska Anna Maria's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Czerwinska Anna Maria's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Czerwinska Anna Maria's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Czerwinska Anna Maria's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:09 | 09:45 to 06:36 | 52.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:18 | 10:22 to 08:04 | 38.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 06:37 to 06:01 | 9.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:10 to 03:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:12 to 06:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 50:56 to 50:56 | 0.0% |
| Czerwinska Anna Maria | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:21 | 00:00 | 05:44 +01:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 07:21 | 05:28 -00:08 | 05:44 +01:37 |
| Running 2 | 05:56 | 12:41 | 06:23 -00:27 | 11:12 +01:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 18:37 | 03:19 -00:09 | 17:35 +01:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:54 | 21:47 | 06:49 -00:55 | 20:54 +00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 06:12 | 27:41 | 07:09 -00:57 | 27:43 -00:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:04 | 33:53 | 06:52 -00:48 | 34:52 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:22 | 39:57 | 08:16 +02:06 | 41:44 -01:47 |
| Running 5 | 06:30 | 50:19 | 07:09 -00:39 | 50:00 +00:19 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 56:49 | 05:48 -00:14 | 57:09 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 06:33 | 01:02:23 | 06:58 -00:25 | 01:02:57 -00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 01:08:56 | 02:38 -00:27 | 01:09:55 -00:59 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 01:11:07 | 07:00 -00:56 | 01:12:33 -01:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:37 | 01:17:11 | 06:13 +00:24 | 01:19:33 -02:22 |
| Running 8 | 06:39 | 01:23:48 | 07:48 -01:09 | 01:25:46 -01:58 |
| Wall Balls | 09:45 | 01:30:27 | 06:40 +03:05 | 01:33:34 -03:07 |
| Roxzone | 09:12 | 01:49:15 | 09:01 +00:11 | 01:49:15 |
Anna Maria Czerwinska, in the HYROX Age Group of 40-44, showcased an impressive performance in her race. She ranked in the top 27% overall and top 26% in her age group which is commendable. Her total running time was 50 minutes and 56 seconds, which was 4 minutes and 26 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, her start was slower than the average in Running 1 but she quickly made up for it in the subsequent segments, finishing each running segment faster than the average. This suggests that she might have started off conservatively and then picked up her pace, which is a smart strategy to prevent early burnout.
Going forward, Anna Maria should consider the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hölk Andrea | 2018 Hamburg | 01:49:40 | |
| Welsh Amber | 2023 London | 01:48:53 | |
| Schoenmaker Lauri | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:48:49 | |
| Van Meurs Manuela | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:49:44 | |
| Anderson Alessia | 2024 Melbourne | 01:49:04 | |
| Reich Sabine | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:48:57 | |
| Jenkins Corinne | 2024 Singapore | 01:49:07 | |
| Clines Joanna | 2023 Chicago | 01:48:49 | |
| Weir Amy | 2024 Melbourne | 01:48:57 | |
| Slocum Tracy | 2023 Dallas | 01:48:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
