Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peak Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peak Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peak Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peak Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:39 | 52:30 to 44:51 | 90.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:39 | 02:55 to 02:16 | 7.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:10 | 05:36 to 05:26 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:21 to 06:21 | 0.0% |
| Peak Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:50 -00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 04:29 | 04:33 -00:06 | 04:50 -00:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 08:56 | 05:18 -00:17 | 09:23 -00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 13:57 | 03:08 -01:08 | 14:41 -00:44 |
| Running 3 | 05:54 | 15:57 | 05:46 +00:08 | 17:49 -01:52 |
| Sled Pull | 04:13 | 21:51 | 05:24 -01:11 | 23:35 -01:44 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 26:04 | 05:46 +00:01 | 28:59 -02:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:13 | 31:51 | 06:00 -00:47 | 34:45 -02:54 |
| Running 5 | 06:01 | 37:04 | 05:58 +00:03 | 40:45 -03:41 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 43:05 | 04:58 -00:12 | 46:43 -03:38 |
| Running 6 | 08:27 | 47:51 | 05:49 +02:38 | 51:41 -03:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:55 | 56:18 | 02:22 +00:33 | 57:30 -01:12 |
| Running 7 | 08:12 | 59:13 | 05:47 +02:25 | 59:52 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 01:07:25 | 05:38 -00:02 | 01:05:39 +01:46 |
| Running 8 | 08:44 | 01:13:01 | 06:35 +02:09 | 01:11:17 +01:44 |
| Wall Balls | 06:21 | 01:21:45 | 07:16 -00:55 | 01:17:52 +03:53 |
| Roxzone | 04:56 | 01:32:53 | 07:45 -02:49 | 01:32:53 |
Andrew's best running lap was 00:04:29, which was 00:12 faster than the average. This indicates that he has good speed and endurance in shorter running segments. However, his total running time was slower than average, suggesting that he may need to focus more on his overall fitness and transition times.
Overall, Andrew Peak performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas that can be improved to enhance his performance. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, focusing on areas of weakness, and implementing race strategies, Andrew can continue to improve his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Szczuka Paweł | 2024 Katowice | 01:32:25 | |
| Nicolodi Marco | 2024 Milan | 01:33:22 | |
| Gilder James | 2023 London | 01:32:25 | |
| Fenwick Jonathan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:05 | |
| Wells Jason | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:32:30 | |
| Beachell Ben | 2023 Glasgow | 01:32:34 | |
| König Holger | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:33:14 | |
| Weber Alan | 2023 Chicago | 01:32:44 | |
| Decker Daniel | 2022 Dallas | 01:33:18 | |
| De Weerd Thijs | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:32:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
