Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Glew Anthony's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Glew Anthony's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Glew Anthony's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Glew Anthony's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:09 | 06:02 to 04:53 | 51.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:23 | 05:07 to 04:44 | 17.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 | 04:49 to 04:33 | 12.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:54 to 02:39 | 11.3% |
| Run Total | 00:07 | 41:16 to 41:09 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:23 to 04:21 | 1.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:02 to 02:01 | 0.8% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Glew Anthony | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:41 | 00:00 | 04:34 +01:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:41 | 04:25 -00:02 | 04:34 +01:07 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 10:04 | 04:53 -00:02 | 08:59 +01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 14:55 | 02:52 +00:02 | 13:52 +01:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:02 | 17:49 | 05:20 -00:18 | 16:44 +01:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 22:51 | 04:51 -00:02 | 22:04 +00:47 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 27:40 | 05:18 -00:19 | 26:55 +00:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 32:39 | 05:12 +00:50 | 32:13 +00:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:10 | 38:41 | 05:28 -00:18 | 37:25 +01:16 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 43:51 | 04:47 -00:12 | 42:53 +00:58 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 48:26 | 05:20 -00:05 | 47:40 +00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 53:41 | 02:09 -00:07 | 53:00 +00:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 55:43 | 05:19 -00:16 | 55:09 +00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:07 | 01:00:46 | 04:59 +00:08 | 01:00:28 +00:18 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:05:53 | 05:54 -00:36 | 01:05:27 +00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 05:37 | 01:11:11 | 06:19 -00:42 | 01:11:21 -00:10 |
| Roxzone | 07:37 | 01:24:18 | 06:38 +00:59 | 01:24:18 |
Anthony Glew competed in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 226, placing him in the top 32% of the 688 athletes, and 44th in his age group (35-39), which is in the top 35% of his category. His total race time was 01:24:18. A key highlight of Anthony's performance is his total running time of 00:41:16, which is 01:09 faster than the average. This suggests that Anthony has a strong runner profile. However, his pacing indicates that he started off a bit slower, as seen in Running 1, and then improved his pace in subsequent running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sagdahl Kim Andre | 2024 Beijing | 01:24:11 | |
| Chang Steven | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:23:57 | |
| Ulfving Johan | 2023 Stockholm | 01:24:09 | |
| Burandt Oliver | 2018 Hamburg | 01:24:10 | |
| Tortola Ronald | 2020 Dallas | 01:24:14 | |
| Van Den Berge Kasper | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:24:31 | |
| Hamilton Kennedy | 2023 Birmingham | 01:23:57 | |
| Olchawa Tomasz | 2024 Katowice | 01:24:39 | |
| Griffon Tom | 2024 Paris | 01:24:28 | |
| Zeidler Alex | 2019 Hamburg | 01:24:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
