Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 413 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Frison Markus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Frison Markus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Frison Markus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Frison Markus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:55 | 34:40 to 31:45 | 57.2% |
| Sled Push | 01:52 | 04:20 to 02:28 | 36.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:01 to 03:51 | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 01:40 to 01:34 | 2.0% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:10 to 04:07 | 1.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:18 to 03:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Frison Markus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 03:40 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 03:41 | 03:58 +00:03 | 03:40 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 03:45 | 07:42 | 03:51 -00:06 | 07:38 +00:04 |
| Sled Push | 04:20 | 11:27 | 03:01 +01:19 | 11:29 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 04:22 | 15:47 | 04:09 +00:13 | 14:30 +01:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:07 | 20:09 | 04:41 -00:34 | 18:39 +01:30 |
| Running 4 | 04:29 | 24:16 | 04:09 +00:20 | 23:20 +00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:38 | 28:45 | 03:19 -00:41 | 27:29 +01:16 |
| Running 5 | 04:23 | 31:23 | 04:14 +00:09 | 30:48 +00:35 |
| Rowing | 04:10 | 35:46 | 04:15 -00:05 | 35:02 +00:44 |
| Running 6 | 04:11 | 39:56 | 04:10 +00:01 | 39:17 +00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:40 | 44:07 | 01:45 -00:05 | 43:27 +00:40 |
| Running 7 | 04:17 | 45:47 | 04:13 +00:04 | 45:12 +00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:18 | 50:04 | 03:56 -00:38 | 49:25 +00:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:35 | 53:22 | 04:29 +01:06 | 53:21 +00:01 |
| Wall Balls | 04:02 | 58:57 | 05:17 -01:15 | 57:50 +01:07 |
| Roxzone | 04:41 | 01:07:34 | 04:27 +00:14 | 01:07:34 |
In terms of the overall time, Markus completed the race in 01:07:34. His total running time was 00:34:40, which is 00:55 slower than the average. This indicates that he may benefit from improving his running performance. However, it is important to note that his best running lap was 00:03:41, which was 00:01 faster than average. This suggests that Markus has the potential to excel in running and should focus on enhancing this aspect of his performance.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific exercises and drills tailored to his areas of improvement, Markus Frison can further enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. With his strong overall rank and top placement in his age group, he has already demonstrated great potential and can continue to excel in the sport.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Puzone Swan | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:07:49 | |
| Arocha RodrÃguez Adán | 2024 Madrid | 01:07:05 | |
| Mandaras Victor | 2024 Turin | 01:07:38 | |
| Lebois Flavien | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:07:52 | |
| Jouve Olivier | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:07:30 | |
| Tieu Johnny | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:07:34 | |
| Schorah Wesley | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:07:19 | |
| Pires Canto Michaël | 2024 Madrid | 01:07:54 | |
| Weersma Hidde | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:07:49 | |
| Joud Hugo | 2024 Paris | 01:07:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
