Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cornhill Max's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cornhill Max's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cornhill Max's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cornhill Max's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 14:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 12:31 | 50:38 to 38:07 | 86.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:43 | 03:03 to 02:20 | 5.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:40 | 05:52 to 05:12 | 4.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:28 | 02:16 to 01:48 | 3.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 04:15 to 04:12 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:24 to 03:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Cornhill Max | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:58 | 03:58 | 04:19 -00:21 | 04:18 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 03:45 | 07:56 | 04:37 -00:52 | 08:37 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 11:41 | 02:40 +00:23 | 13:14 -01:33 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 14:44 | 05:00 -00:14 | 15:54 -01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 02:48 | 19:30 | 04:26 -01:38 | 20:54 -01:24 |
| Running 4 | 10:40 | 22:18 | 04:58 +05:42 | 25:20 -03:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:24 | 32:58 | 04:36 -01:12 | 30:18 +02:40 |
| Running 5 | 04:48 | 36:22 | 05:06 -00:18 | 34:54 +01:28 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 41:10 | 04:38 -00:14 | 40:00 +01:10 |
| Running 6 | 04:35 | 45:34 | 05:00 -00:25 | 44:38 +00:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 50:09 | 02:00 +00:16 | 49:38 +00:31 |
| Running 7 | 04:33 | 52:25 | 04:59 -00:26 | 51:38 +00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 56:58 | 04:32 -00:17 | 56:37 +00:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:36 | 01:01:13 | 05:26 +00:10 | 01:01:09 +00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 05:52 | 01:06:49 | 05:42 +00:10 | 01:06:35 +00:14 |
| Roxzone | 05:37 | 01:18:11 | 05:54 -00:17 | 01:18:11 |
Max's best running lap was 00:03:45, indicating his capability to maintain a strong pace. However, there were certain segments where he gained or lost time compared to the average splits. Notably, he performed significantly slower in the Running 4 segment, taking 05:41 longer than the average time. This suggests that Max may need to focus on improving his running endurance and speed in this particular segment.
In summary, Max Cornhill performed well in the HYROX race, achieving a solid overall rank and demonstrating strength in certain segments. To enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness and endurance, particularly in the Running 4 segment. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and form corrections can help him become more efficient and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maleki Matthew | 2024 London | 01:18:03 | |
| Coombs Andrew John | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:23 | |
| Fagan Conor | 2024 Milan | 01:17:44 | |
| Hall Richard | 2023 Singapore | 01:17:56 | |
| Osman Zachary | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:17:43 | |
| Van Der Woude Roy | 2024 Maastricht | 01:17:44 | |
| Lacouture Anthony | 2023 London | 01:17:50 | |
| Fontanella Gregori | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:11 | |
| White Liam | 2023 New York | 01:18:13 | |
| Hmila Sophian | 2024 Paris | 01:18:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:15:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
