Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Buijs Marco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Buijs Marco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Buijs Marco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Buijs Marco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:09 | 48:15 to 44:06 | 71.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:39 | 07:14 to 05:35 | 28.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Buijs Marco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 04:49 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 03:58 | 04:32 -00:11 | 04:49 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 06:00 | 08:19 | 05:13 +00:47 | 09:21 -01:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 14:19 | 03:05 -00:37 | 14:34 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 06:22 | 16:47 | 05:42 +00:40 | 17:39 -00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 23:09 | 05:17 -00:21 | 23:21 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 28:05 | 05:39 +00:35 | 28:38 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:14 | 34:19 | 05:53 +01:21 | 34:17 +00:02 |
| Running 5 | 06:18 | 41:33 | 05:52 +00:26 | 40:10 +01:23 |
| Rowing | 04:27 | 47:51 | 04:56 -00:29 | 46:02 +01:49 |
| Running 6 | 06:10 | 52:18 | 05:41 +00:29 | 50:58 +01:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:47 | 58:28 | 02:19 -00:32 | 56:39 +01:49 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 01:00:15 | 05:40 +00:27 | 58:58 +01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 01:06:22 | 05:31 -00:53 | 01:04:38 +01:44 |
| Running 8 | 07:09 | 01:11:00 | 06:24 +00:45 | 01:10:09 +00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 04:56 | 01:18:09 | 07:07 -02:11 | 01:16:33 +01:36 |
| Roxzone | 08:16 | 01:31:12 | 07:32 +00:44 | 01:31:12 |
Based on the splits analysis, Marco showed strength in the Running 1, Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls segments. These segments were faster than average, indicating that Marco excels in exercises requiring strength and power.
However, Marco struggled in the Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8 segments. These segments were slower than average, suggesting that Marco needs to work on his endurance and running speed.
By implementing these training strategies and race strategies, Marco Buijs can improve his performance in future HYROX races. Focusing on improving his running speed, endurance, and reducing transition times will help him achieve better overall results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moran Michael | 2024 Dublin | 01:31:40 | |
| Dunnink Bram | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:31:20 | |
| Nieland Philipp | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:31:30 | |
| James Benjamin | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:31:12 | |
| Savoureux Jonathan | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:31:19 | |
| Song James | 2022 Madrid | 01:31:17 | |
| Jurk Alex | 2019 Hamburg | 01:30:44 | |
| Leung Michael | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:31:10 | |
| Weber Nicolaj | 2023 Malmö | 01:30:43 | |
| Eickmann Maximilian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:30:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:00 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:32:03 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
