Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Underhill Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Underhill Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Underhill Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Underhill Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:53 | 08:01 to 06:08 | 53.6% |
| Run Total | 00:45 | 42:44 to 41:59 | 21.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:24 | 05:06 to 04:42 | 11.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 05:23 to 05:05 | 8.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:56 to 02:45 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Underhill Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:01 | 00:00 | 04:41 -00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:01 | 04:28 -00:06 | 04:41 -00:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:23 | 05:01 -00:01 | 09:09 -00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 13:23 | 02:56 +00:00 | 14:10 -00:47 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 16:19 | 05:26 +00:06 | 17:06 -00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 05:06 | 21:51 | 05:00 +00:06 | 22:32 -00:41 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 26:57 | 05:26 +00:00 | 27:32 -00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:23 | 32:23 | 05:23 +00:00 | 32:58 -00:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:25 | 37:46 | 05:36 -00:11 | 38:21 -00:35 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 43:11 | 04:51 -00:15 | 43:57 -00:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 47:47 | 05:29 +00:02 | 48:48 -01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 53:18 | 02:12 -00:08 | 54:17 -00:59 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 55:22 | 05:27 -00:01 | 56:29 -01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:19 | 01:00:48 | 05:10 -00:51 | 01:01:56 -01:08 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:05:07 | 06:05 +00:22 | 01:07:06 -01:59 |
| Wall Balls | 08:01 | 01:11:34 | 06:35 +01:26 | 01:13:11 -01:37 |
| Roxzone | 07:16 | 01:26:42 | 06:56 +00:20 | 01:26:42 |
Tom showed strength in certain segments, such as Running 1, Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Running 4, Running 5, Rowing, Farmers Carry, Running 7, and Sandbag Lunges, where he performed faster than the average time. However, he struggled in segments like Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, and Running 8, where he was slower than the average time.
Based on his splits, it appears that Tom has a better running profile than strength profile, as his total running time was faster than the average. However, his performance in some running segments, such as Running 2, Running 3, and Running 6, could be improved.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training techniques, Tom Underhill can improve his performance in future HYROX races. It is important for him to focus on his weaknesses while also maintaining his strengths as a runner. With consistent training and dedication, he can continue to improve and achieve even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcinroy Owen | 2023 Manchester | 01:26:42 | |
| Benetton Tommaso | 2024 Rimini | 01:26:44 | |
| Hill Spencer | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:42 | |
| OReilly Connor | 2024 London | 01:26:12 | |
| Freund Sebastian | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:26:22 | |
| Ellender Daniel | 2024 Dallas | 01:26:15 | |
| Stiefenhofer Philipp | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:26:38 | |
| Clark Tom | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:44 | |
| Rabis Antoine | 2024 Marseille | 01:26:38 | |
| Barbé Guillaume | 2024 Marseille | 01:27:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
