Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Leus Franc's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Leus Franc's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Leus Franc's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Leus Franc's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
09:19.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Franc Leus demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 61% overall and top 60% in his age group. His overall time was 01:43:38, with a total running time of 00:56:23, which is 5:18 slower than average, indicating that running is an area for improvement. His fastest running lap was 00:06:17, showing potential for higher running efficiency. Franc started the initial segments strong, particularly excelling in exercises like the Ski Erg and Sled Push, illustrating his strength capabilities. However, as the race progressed, his running times significantly lagged, suggesting he may have started too fast and struggled to maintain pace. This indicates a need to improve endurance and running efficiency while maintaining his strength profile.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Given the slower running segments, focus on enhancing overall running efficiency.
Training Strategies: Incorporate interval training, tempo runs, and hill sprints to build endurance and speed. Utilize distance runs to improve aerobic capacity.
Exercises: Perform running drills such as high knees, butt kicks, and A-skips to improve running form and cadence.
Burpees Broad Jump: This segment was 1:41 slower than average, indicating a need for enhanced explosive power and endurance.
Training Strategies: Include plyometrics, such as box jumps and kettlebell swings, to boost explosive strength. Practice burpees with an emphasis on form and efficiency.
Exercises: Incorporate circuit training combining burpees, lunges, and jump squats to simulate race conditions and improve stamina.
Sandbag Lunges: This segment was 22 seconds slower than average, suggesting a need for improved leg strength and balance under load.
Training Strategies: Focus on strength training exercises such as weighted lunges, squats, and deadlifts to enhance lower body strength.
Exercises: Practice sandbag carries and lunges to build familiarity with the race equipment and improve core stability.
Race Strategies
Consistent Pacing: Develop a race strategy that avoids starting too fast to conserve energy for later segments. Use a heart rate monitor to maintain a steady pace, aiming to slightly negative split the running segments.
Transition Efficiency: Work on reducing roxzone times by practicing quick transitions between exercises. Set up mock transitions during training to simulate race day conditions.
Compromised Running Scenarios: Include compromised workouts that mix running with strength exercises to train the body to handle fatigue. For example, perform a high-intensity circuit followed by a run to mimic race fatigue.