Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bates Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bates Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bates Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bates Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:31 | 40:35 to 39:04 | 76.5% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 04:59 to 04:35 | 20.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 04:16 to 04:12 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Bates Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:03 | 00:00 | 04:21 -01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 03:03 | 04:21 -00:07 | 04:21 -01:18 |
| Running 2 | 04:13 | 07:17 | 04:42 -00:29 | 08:42 -01:25 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 11:30 | 02:42 -00:43 | 13:24 -01:54 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 13:29 | 05:05 +00:09 | 16:06 -02:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:16 | 18:43 | 04:32 -00:16 | 21:11 -02:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 22:59 | 05:04 +00:09 | 25:43 -02:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:14 | 28:12 | 04:47 -00:33 | 30:47 -02:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 32:26 | 05:12 +00:45 | 35:34 -03:08 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 38:23 | 04:40 +00:19 | 40:46 -02:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 43:22 | 05:05 +00:10 | 45:26 -02:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 48:37 | 02:02 -00:24 | 50:31 -01:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 50:15 | 05:03 +00:27 | 52:33 -02:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:04 | 55:45 | 04:40 -00:36 | 57:36 -01:51 |
| Running 8 | 06:14 | 59:49 | 05:32 +00:42 | 01:02:16 -02:27 |
| Wall Balls | 05:15 | 01:06:03 | 05:53 -00:38 | 01:07:48 -01:45 |
| Roxzone | 08:36 | 01:19:46 | 06:05 +02:31 | 01:19:46 |
Daniel Bates, a young athlete in the 16-24 age group, showcased a promising performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX event. He ranked in the top 47% of the 1203 participants and secured the 58th position in his age group. Overall, the notable highlights of his performance were his excellent start and commendable strength exercises. However, his overall running time of 40:35 was slightly slower than the average by 21 seconds, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance and speed. He seemed to have a hybrid profile, with a balance between running and strength, although the strength part seems to be slightly dominant. His pacing strategy revealed a strong start with the first four segments being faster than average, but gradually slowed down towards the end of the race.
For future races, Daniel should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wood Jake | 2023 Manchester | 01:19:35 | |
| Gransjean Philip | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:19:16 | |
| Whittle Andrew | 2021 London | 01:19:23 | |
| Escorcio Courtenay | 2024 London | 01:19:24 | |
| Roberts James | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:56 | |
| Schwarz David | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:19:33 | |
| Morgan Dylan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:07 | |
| Craig Scott | 2022 Manchester | 01:19:44 | |
| Caton Aaron | 2024 Paris | 01:19:46 | |
| Leung Michael | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:19:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:17:58 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:24:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
