Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Alekna Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Alekna Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Alekna Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Alekna Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:22 | 39:04 to 37:42 | 44.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:26 | 04:37 to 04:11 | 14.1% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 04:54 to 04:30 | 13.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 04:24 to 04:08 | 8.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 04:19 to 04:07 | 6.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:29 to 02:18 | 5.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 05:17 to 05:06 | 5.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 01:50 to 01:47 | 1.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Alekna Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 05:16 | 04:19 +00:18 | 04:18 +00:58 |
| Running 2 | 04:34 | 09:53 | 04:34 +00:00 | 08:37 +01:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 14:27 | 02:37 -00:08 | 13:11 +01:16 |
| Running 3 | 04:48 | 16:56 | 04:57 -00:09 | 15:48 +01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 21:44 | 04:22 -00:25 | 20:45 +00:59 |
| Running 4 | 04:52 | 25:41 | 04:55 -00:03 | 25:07 +00:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:19 | 30:33 | 04:35 -00:16 | 30:02 +00:31 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 34:52 | 05:03 -00:04 | 34:37 +00:15 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 39:51 | 04:37 +00:17 | 39:40 +00:11 |
| Running 6 | 04:54 | 44:45 | 04:57 -00:03 | 44:17 +00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 49:39 | 01:59 -00:09 | 49:14 +00:25 |
| Running 7 | 04:55 | 51:29 | 04:55 +00:00 | 51:13 +00:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 56:24 | 04:30 -00:06 | 56:08 +00:16 |
| Running 8 | 04:49 | 01:00:48 | 05:23 -00:34 | 01:00:38 +00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:17 | 01:05:37 | 05:40 -00:23 | 01:06:01 -00:24 |
| Roxzone | 06:43 | 01:17:30 | 05:49 +00:54 | 01:17:30 |
Andrew Alekna delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Perth HYROX event, finishing within the top 18% of all athletes. His total time of 01:17:30 indicates a strong showing, particularly in his age group, where he ranked 27th. Andrew’s running abilities stand out as a key strength; his total running time was notably 00:21 faster than the average, suggesting that he has a runner's profile. His pacing strategy was slightly off at the start, with Running 1 being slower than average, indicating a more conservative start. However, he quickly adjusted and maintained a consistent pace, with his best running lap being 00:04:34. This suggests a solid endurance base and the ability to maintain speed across running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprenger Philipp | 2020 Hannover | 01:17:28 | |
| Mohr Marcel | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:17:58 | |
| Carroll Steven | 2023 London | 01:17:39 | |
| Young Matty | 2022 Birmingham | 01:17:18 | |
| Bria Tony | 2024 New York | 01:17:59 | |
| Field Matt | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:43 | |
| Thomas Alexander | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:17:39 | |
| Jones Tom | 2024 London | 01:17:54 | |
| Dehnen Cedric | 2021 Hamburg | 01:17:30 | |
| Fernandez Stephane | 2023 Madrid | 01:17:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
