Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Essen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Herrmann Maximilian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Herrmann Maximilian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Herrmann Maximilian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Herrmann Maximilian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:20 | 08:42 to 06:22 | 30.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:37 | 06:54 to 05:17 | 20.8% |
| Sled Push | 01:29 | 04:19 to 02:50 | 19.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 05:39 to 04:51 | 10.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:35 | 02:42 to 02:07 | 7.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:30 | 04:56 to 04:26 | 6.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 05:25 to 05:03 | 4.7% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:54 to 04:48 | 1.3% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:03 to 38:03 | 0.0% |
| Herrmann Maximilian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:11 | 00:00 | 04:43 -00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 04:11 | 04:29 +00:27 | 04:43 -00:32 |
| Running 2 | 04:12 | 09:07 | 05:06 -00:54 | 09:12 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 04:19 | 13:19 | 03:00 +01:19 | 14:18 -00:59 |
| Running 3 | 04:40 | 17:38 | 05:33 -00:53 | 17:18 +00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 05:39 | 22:18 | 05:06 +00:33 | 22:51 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 27:57 | 05:32 -00:48 | 27:57 +00:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:54 | 32:41 | 05:37 +01:17 | 33:29 -00:48 |
| Running 5 | 04:55 | 39:35 | 05:42 -00:47 | 39:06 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 44:30 | 04:53 +00:01 | 44:48 -00:18 |
| Running 6 | 04:52 | 49:24 | 05:34 -00:42 | 49:41 -00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 54:16 | 02:15 +00:27 | 55:15 -00:59 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 56:58 | 05:33 -00:49 | 57:30 -00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:01:42 | 05:21 +00:04 | 01:03:03 -01:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:49 | 01:07:07 | 06:13 -00:24 | 01:08:24 -01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 08:42 | 01:12:56 | 06:48 +01:54 | 01:14:37 -01:41 |
| Roxzone | 07:01 | 01:28:33 | 07:08 -00:07 | 01:28:33 |
Maximilian showed strength in his running performance, with his total running time being faster than average. This suggests that he has a runner profile and should continue to focus on improving his strength to further enhance his performance.
Additionally, Maximilian should prioritize efficient transitions in the roxzone. By improving his overall fitness and specifically working on his transition time, he can minimize the time spent in the roxzone and maintain momentum throughout the race.
Overall, Maximilian Herrmann has shown strength in his running performance and should continue to focus on improving his overall fitness and strength to enhance his performance in specific segments. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can work towards achieving better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Corley Darryl | 2022 London | 01:28:29 | |
| Klosen Jordy | 2024 Köln | 01:28:52 | |
| Mcmullan Lee | 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:08 | |
| Persson Robin | 2024 Stockholm | 01:28:19 | |
| Beevers Ben | 2024 Rimini | 01:28:57 | |
| Siles Benoit | 2024 Paris | 01:28:53 | |
| Gilling Burns Liam | 2023 Dublin | 01:28:14 | |
| Huppertz Christian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:28:16 | |
| Vowles Paul | 2024 London | 01:29:00 | |
| Kritzinger Daniel | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:23:24 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
