Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kuehling Henry's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kuehling Henry's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kuehling Henry's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kuehling Henry's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:13 | 10:54 to 07:41 | 55.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:25 | 07:48 to 06:23 | 24.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:08 | 07:05 to 05:57 | 19.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:54 to 46:54 | 0.0% |
| Kuehling Henry | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:22 | 00:00 | 05:03 +01:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 06:22 | 04:39 -00:01 | 05:03 +01:19 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 11:00 | 05:34 -00:24 | 09:42 +01:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 16:10 | 03:25 -00:59 | 15:16 +00:54 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 18:36 | 06:06 -00:50 | 18:41 -00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 23:52 | 05:51 -01:58 | 24:47 -00:55 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 27:45 | 06:04 -00:35 | 30:38 -02:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:48 | 33:14 | 06:36 +01:12 | 36:42 -03:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 41:02 | 06:20 -00:56 | 43:18 -02:16 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 46:26 | 05:07 -00:26 | 49:38 -03:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 51:07 | 06:08 -00:47 | 54:45 -03:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 56:28 | 02:31 -00:12 | 01:00:53 -04:25 |
| Running 7 | 08:08 | 58:47 | 06:08 +02:00 | 01:03:24 -04:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:05 | 01:06:55 | 06:12 +00:53 | 01:09:32 -02:37 |
| Running 8 | 05:48 | 01:14:00 | 07:07 -01:19 | 01:15:44 -01:44 |
| Wall Balls | 10:54 | 01:19:48 | 07:55 +02:59 | 01:22:51 -03:03 |
| Roxzone | 08:44 | 01:39:17 | 08:31 +00:13 | 01:39:17 |
Henry Kuehling's overall performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race demonstrates a commendable effort, placing him within the top 54% of all athletes and top 47% in his age group. His total running time was 1:54 faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his pacing analysis reveals that he started slower than average in the first running segment, suggesting a cautious start. As the race progressed, his running improved significantly, consistently outperforming the average in subsequent running segments. This indicates that while Henry has a solid running foundation, his strength-based exercises could use more focus, making him more of a runner than a strength-oriented athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hill Jonathan | 2022 London | 01:38:51 | |
| Maier Johann | 2022 München | 01:39:02 | |
| Dash Sam | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:39:30 | |
| Albrecht Mario | 2021 Hamburg | 01:39:06 | |
| Pulido Cortes Andres Felipe | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:39:44 | |
| Castaner Antony | 2024 Marseille | 01:38:59 | |
| Van Der Goes Thomas | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:38:55 | |
| Granfors Andy | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:38:52 | |
| Stegall Alec | 2024 Houston | 01:39:01 | |
| Ceppi Simone | 2024 Rimini | 01:38:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
