Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 472 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Janssen Niek's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Janssen Niek's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Janssen Niek's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Janssen Niek's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:59 | 58:12 to 54:13 | 61.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:09 | 08:28 to 07:19 | 17.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:55 | 07:50 to 06:55 | 14.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 03:13 to 02:59 | 3.6% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:34 to 05:27 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 05:00 to 04:56 | 1.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:08 to 03:08 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:06 to 07:06 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:50 to 08:50 | 0.0% |
| Janssen Niek | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:30 | 00:00 | 05:35 -00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 05:30 | 04:54 +00:06 | 05:35 -00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:38 | 10:30 | 06:18 -00:40 | 10:29 +00:01 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 16:08 | 03:57 -00:49 | 16:47 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 06:27 | 19:16 | 07:07 -00:40 | 20:44 -01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 07:50 | 25:43 | 07:05 +00:45 | 27:51 -02:08 |
| Running 4 | 07:11 | 33:33 | 07:07 +00:04 | 34:56 -01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:06 | 40:44 | 08:20 -01:14 | 42:03 -01:19 |
| Running 5 | 06:43 | 47:50 | 07:30 -00:47 | 50:23 -02:33 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 54:33 | 05:32 +00:02 | 57:53 -03:20 |
| Running 6 | 07:15 | 01:00:07 | 07:12 +00:03 | 01:03:25 -03:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:13 | 01:07:22 | 02:55 +00:18 | 01:10:37 -03:15 |
| Running 7 | 07:26 | 01:10:35 | 07:14 +00:12 | 01:13:32 -02:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:28 | 01:18:01 | 07:39 +00:49 | 01:20:46 -02:45 |
| Running 8 | 12:05 | 01:26:29 | 09:06 +02:59 | 01:28:25 -01:56 |
| Wall Balls | 08:50 | 01:38:34 | 09:55 -01:05 | 01:37:31 +01:03 |
| Roxzone | 10:57 | 01:58:13 | 10:47 +00:10 | 01:58:13 |
From the splits analysis, it is evident that Niek's best performance came in the Sled Push, Running 3, Burpees Broad Jump, and Running 5 segments, where he was faster than the average time. This indicates that he has strength and endurance in these areas. However, he struggled in segments such as Running 8, Run Total, Sandbag Lunges, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and the Best Lap, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
Overall, Niek Janssen has shown promise in certain segments of the Hyrox race but has areas that need improvement. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his performance in the identified areas and improve his overall race results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Button Chris | 2023 London | 01:58:33 | |
| Raja Dipak | 2023 London | 01:58:01 | |
| Leong Keat | 2024 Singapore | 01:57:58 | |
| King Andy | 2024 London | 01:58:42 | |
| Paulsen Basti | 2023 Hamburg | 01:58:02 | |
| Corpus Philip | 2023 Singapore | 01:57:54 | |
| Shahbazi Milad | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:57:57 | |
| Bratos Domínguez Jesús | 2022 Madrid | 01:57:55 | |
| Hasselbalch Lars | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:58:23 | |
| Pape Felix | 2018 Hamburg | 01:57:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:32 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:39:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
