Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hocking Riley's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hocking Riley's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hocking Riley's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hocking Riley's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:00 | 42:16 to 37:16 | 87.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 04:23 to 04:01 | 6.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 04:03 to 03:54 | 2.6% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:38 to 04:29 | 2.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 01:50 to 01:45 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:23 to 03:23 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Hocking Riley | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:14 +00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 04:29 | 04:18 -00:10 | 04:14 +00:15 |
| Running 2 | 06:02 | 08:37 | 04:33 +01:29 | 08:32 +00:05 |
| Sled Push | 01:57 | 14:39 | 02:37 -00:40 | 13:05 +01:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 16:36 | 04:54 +00:17 | 15:42 +00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 04:03 | 21:47 | 04:21 -00:18 | 20:36 +01:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:14 | 25:50 | 04:53 +00:21 | 24:57 +00:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:23 | 31:04 | 04:32 -00:09 | 29:50 +01:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 35:27 | 05:00 +00:15 | 34:22 +01:05 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 40:42 | 04:36 +00:02 | 39:22 +01:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 45:20 | 04:54 +00:23 | 43:58 +01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 50:37 | 01:58 -00:08 | 48:52 +01:45 |
| Running 7 | 04:48 | 52:27 | 04:52 -00:04 | 50:50 +01:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:23 | 57:15 | 04:27 -01:04 | 55:42 +01:33 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:00:38 | 05:17 +00:47 | 01:00:09 +00:29 |
| Wall Balls | 04:21 | 01:06:42 | 05:38 -01:17 | 01:05:26 +01:16 |
| Roxzone | 05:51 | 01:16:47 | 05:43 +00:08 | 01:16:47 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the splits analysis, Riley's overall running time was 04:43 slower than the average. This suggests that he may benefit from improving his running abilities. While his total running time is slower, it is important to note that his best running lap time was 00:04:29, indicating that he has the potential to perform well in shorter running segments. Additionally, his time in the sled push and sled pull segments was faster than average, suggesting that he has a strength advantage in these areas.
In conclusion, Riley Hocking performed well in the HYROX race in Melbourne. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his running abilities, particularly in longer segments. Incorporating interval training, endurance runs, and speed drills into his training routine will help him improve his overall performance. Additionally, working on reducing transition time in the Roxzone and focusing on strength training exercises will contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ogden Alex | 2023 London | 01:17:10 | |
| Waroux Jordy | 2022 Maastricht | 01:16:52 | |
| Youyu Chen HKGHYROX | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:17:07 | |
| Niesten Mauro | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:16:51 | |
| Fährmann Mario | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:16:23 | |
| Sarkam Brian | 2024 Maastricht | 01:17:17 | |
| Lerner Martin | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:17:03 | |
| Coureaud Quentin | 2024 Marseille | 01:17:11 | |
| Wilson Dean | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:17:17 | |
| Mclean Lachlan | 2024 Sydney | 01:17:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:14:10 | |
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:09:15 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
