Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Franke Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Franke Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Franke Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Franke Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:30 | 37:24 to 34:54 | 56.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:46 | 04:17 to 03:31 | 17.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:43 | 05:14 to 04:31 | 16.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 04:24 to 04:03 | 7.9% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:28 to 04:21 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:15 to 03:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:23 to 01:23 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:30 to 03:30 | 0.0% |
| Franke Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:25 | 00:00 | 03:59 -00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:25 | 04:12 +00:12 | 03:59 -00:34 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 07:49 | 04:17 +00:30 | 08:11 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 01:46 | 12:36 | 02:27 -00:41 | 12:28 +00:08 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 14:22 | 04:34 +00:12 | 14:55 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 03:15 | 19:08 | 04:00 -00:45 | 19:29 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 04:42 | 22:23 | 04:33 +00:09 | 23:29 -01:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:17 | 27:05 | 04:03 +00:14 | 28:02 -00:57 |
| Running 5 | 04:51 | 31:22 | 04:40 +00:11 | 32:05 -00:43 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 36:13 | 04:29 -00:01 | 36:45 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 04:47 | 40:41 | 04:34 +00:13 | 41:14 -00:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:23 | 45:28 | 01:49 -00:26 | 45:48 -00:20 |
| Running 7 | 04:56 | 46:51 | 04:34 +00:22 | 47:37 -00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:30 | 51:47 | 04:02 -00:32 | 52:11 -00:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:12 | 55:17 | 04:53 +00:19 | 56:13 -00:56 |
| Wall Balls | 05:14 | 01:00:29 | 05:05 +00:09 | 01:01:06 -00:37 |
| Roxzone | 05:39 | 01:11:15 | 05:04 +00:35 | 01:11:15 |
Tim Franke delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event, securing an overall rank of 231 out of 3118 athletes, placing him in the top 7%. Within his age group (35-39), he ranked 53rd out of 555, marking him in the top 9%. His overall race time was 01:11:15. Despite the strong finish, Tim's total running time was 00:37:24, which is 00:58 slower than the average, indicating a need to focus on running efficiency. The analysis suggests that Tim has a strong strength profile, excelling in strength-based segments like the Sled Push and Farmers Carry, where he ranked in the top 4% and 9%, respectively. His running segments were slower than average, suggesting that focusing on running speed and endurance would be beneficial. His initial running segment was faster than average, indicating a potential pacing issue, as subsequent runs were consistently slower.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Heeley Karl | 2024 Birmingham | 01:11:00 | |
| Fliegel Christopher | 2024 Rimini | 01:11:24 | |
| Elliman Zane | 2024 Melbourne | 01:10:46 | |
| Traynor Declan | 2022 Manchester | 01:11:10 | |
| Macdonald Rory | 2024 Poznan | 01:11:08 | |
| Eales Andrew | 2023 London | 01:11:01 | |
| Miller John | 2024 Birmingham | 01:11:42 | |
| Oneill Paul | 2023 Barcelona | 01:11:40 | |
| Botten Jamie | 2024 London | 01:11:05 | |
| High Patrick | 2024 New York | 01:11:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:23:04 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:17:58 | |
| 2022 Bremen | 01:39:37 | |
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:45 | |
| 2023 Köln | 01:28:42 | |
| 2024 Köln | 01:17:11 | |
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:32:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
