Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ebbing Andreas Alfred's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ebbing Andreas Alfred's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ebbing Andreas Alfred's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ebbing Andreas Alfred's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:36 | 39:05 to 37:29 | 33.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 05:00 to 04:04 | 19.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 05:50 to 05:03 | 16.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:43 | 03:00 to 02:17 | 15.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 | 04:15 to 03:56 | 6.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 02:03 to 01:46 | 6.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:15 to 04:11 | 1.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 04:08 to 04:06 | 0.7% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Ebbing Andreas Alfred | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:16 | 00:00 | 04:16 +00:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 04:16 | 04:19 -00:04 | 04:16 +00:00 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 08:31 | 04:33 -00:03 | 08:35 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 13:01 | 02:37 +00:23 | 13:08 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 04:49 | 16:01 | 04:55 -00:06 | 15:45 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:15 | 20:50 | 04:21 -00:06 | 20:40 +00:10 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 25:05 | 04:53 +00:01 | 25:01 +00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:00 | 29:59 | 04:33 +00:27 | 29:54 +00:05 |
| Running 5 | 04:57 | 34:59 | 05:01 -00:04 | 34:27 +00:32 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 39:56 | 04:37 -00:15 | 39:28 +00:28 |
| Running 6 | 04:56 | 44:18 | 04:55 +00:01 | 44:05 +00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 49:14 | 01:59 +00:04 | 49:00 +00:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 51:17 | 04:53 +00:10 | 50:59 +00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 56:20 | 04:29 -00:21 | 55:52 +00:28 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:00:28 | 05:19 +00:24 | 01:00:21 +00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 05:50 | 01:06:11 | 05:41 +00:09 | 01:05:40 +00:31 |
| Roxzone | 05:14 | 01:17:08 | 05:47 -00:33 | 01:17:08 |
Based on his splits analysis, Andreas performed consistently well in most segments, with some areas where he gained or lost time compared to the average. His best running lap was 00:04:16, which indicates good speed and endurance.
In conclusion, Andreas Alfred Ebbing had a strong performance in the HYROX race, with notable strengths in his overall rank and age group rank. To further improve his performance, he should focus on improving in the segments where he lost the most time, such as the Burpees Broad Jump and Running 8. Implementing specific training strategies, drills, and exercises targeted towards these areas will help him enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Peterson Charles | 2024 New York | 01:16:44 | |
| Simpson Daniel | 2024 Sydney | 01:16:58 | |
| Sofflichi Ganaël | 2024 Marseille | 01:16:38 | |
| Zahn Sebastian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:16:48 | |
| Pach Alexander | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:17:14 | |
| Browne Andrew | 2024 Brisbane | 01:17:10 | |
| Mccallen Christopher | 2024 Madrid | 01:17:20 | |
| Corcoran Josh | 2024 Brisbane | 01:17:20 | |
| Roca Sans Luis | 2022 Madrid | 01:16:43 | |
| Pfeifer Constantin | 2023 München | 01:17:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
