Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Klijweg Giel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Klijweg Giel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Klijweg Giel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Klijweg Giel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:11 | 07:59 to 05:48 | 46.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:18 | 07:31 to 06:13 | 27.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:07 | 08:35 to 07:28 | 23.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:43 to 04:37 | 2.1% |
| Run Total | 00:03 | 46:48 to 46:45 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:14 to 03:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Klijweg Giel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:04 | 00:00 | 05:02 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 04:04 | 04:38 +00:05 | 05:02 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:44 | 08:47 | 05:27 +00:17 | 09:40 -00:53 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 14:31 | 03:18 -00:04 | 15:07 -00:36 |
| Running 3 | 06:05 | 17:45 | 05:58 +00:07 | 18:25 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 23:50 | 05:41 -00:29 | 24:23 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 29:02 | 06:00 +00:06 | 30:04 -01:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:31 | 35:08 | 06:26 +01:05 | 36:04 -00:56 |
| Running 5 | 06:09 | 42:39 | 06:15 -00:06 | 42:30 +00:09 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 48:48 | 05:06 -00:05 | 48:45 +00:03 |
| Running 6 | 05:48 | 53:49 | 06:03 -00:15 | 53:51 -00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 59:37 | 02:27 -00:11 | 59:54 -00:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 01:01:53 | 06:04 -00:02 | 01:02:21 -00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:59 | 01:07:55 | 06:03 +01:56 | 01:08:25 -00:30 |
| Running 8 | 06:53 | 01:15:54 | 07:01 -00:08 | 01:14:28 +01:26 |
| Wall Balls | 08:35 | 01:22:47 | 07:50 +00:45 | 01:21:29 +01:18 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:37:40 | 08:21 -01:57 | 01:37:40 |
Giel Klijweg delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 54% overall and the top 60% in his age group. His overall time was 01:37:40, showcasing a strong ability to maintain a competitive pace throughout the race. Notably, his total running time of 00:46:48 was 01:27 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. Giel demonstrated a quick start in his first running segment, which was significantly faster than the average, suggesting a tendency to begin the race at a fast pace. His transitions in the Roxzone were notably fast, indicating efficiency in moving between exercise zones. However, there are areas where his performance can be enhanced, particularly in strength-based segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Steven | 2024 Birmingham | 01:37:29 | |
| Cordery Perry | 2022 London | 01:37:24 | |
| Oele Jesse | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:37:48 | |
| Monaghan Gerry | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:38:05 | |
| Van Lanen Martijn | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:37:43 | |
| Marx Björn | 2022 Hamburg | 01:37:10 | |
| Nevarez Daniel | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:38:08 | |
| Warnars Jordy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:20 | |
| Banyols Andréa | 2024 Marseille | 01:37:32 | |
| Perugini Fabio | 2024 Turin | 01:38:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:45:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
