Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Salge Nicole's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Salge Nicole's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Salge Nicole's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Salge Nicole's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 04:07 | 06:28 to 02:21 | 54.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:24 | 06:20 to 04:56 | 18.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:39 | 05:33 to 04:54 | 8.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:32 | 04:45 to 04:13 | 7.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:22 to 02:00 | 4.9% |
| Rowing | 00:21 | 05:29 to 05:08 | 4.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 05:19 to 05:13 | 1.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:40 to 39:40 | 0.0% |
| Salge Nicole | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:12 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:33 | 04:12 | 05:01 +00:32 | 04:58 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:39 | 09:45 | 05:16 -00:37 | 09:59 -00:14 |
| Sled Push | 06:28 | 14:24 | 02:36 +03:52 | 15:15 -00:51 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 20:52 | 05:31 -00:32 | 17:51 +03:01 |
| Sled Pull | 06:20 | 25:51 | 05:25 +00:55 | 23:22 +02:29 |
| Running 4 | 04:56 | 32:11 | 05:33 -00:37 | 28:47 +03:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 37:07 | 05:38 -00:19 | 34:20 +02:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:10 | 42:26 | 05:41 -00:31 | 39:58 +02:28 |
| Rowing | 05:29 | 47:36 | 05:16 +00:13 | 45:39 +01:57 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 53:05 | 05:35 -00:37 | 50:55 +02:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 58:03 | 02:10 +00:12 | 56:30 +01:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 01:00:25 | 05:33 -00:28 | 58:40 +01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 01:05:30 | 04:28 +00:17 | 01:04:13 +01:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:10:15 | 05:55 -00:10 | 01:08:41 +01:34 |
| Wall Balls | 03:46 | 01:16:00 | 04:32 -00:46 | 01:14:36 +01:24 |
| Roxzone | 05:50 | 01:25:26 | 06:18 -00:28 | 01:25:26 |
Nicole's pacing throughout the race was commendable, with consistently faster running times compared to the average. Her total running time was significantly faster than average, indicating that she has a strong running profile. However, there were areas where she lost time, particularly in the segments involving the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, and Sandbag Lunges.
Additionally, she should prioritize efficient transitions between segments. The Roxzone time was 00:11 faster than average, indicating that she transitions well. By continuing to work on her transition speed and efficiency, she can minimize time lost between segments.
Overall, Nicole's strengths lie in her running abilities, as evident from her total running time being faster than average. However, she should continue to work on improving her overall fitness and strength to excel in the segments where she currently loses time. By incorporating the suggested exercises, drills, and training routines, she can enhance her performance in these specific areas and strive for even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cusenza Romina | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:25:25 | |
| Koehn Nicole | 2023 Anaheim | 01:24:59 | |
| Kleefstra Sjoukje | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:28 | |
| Araujo Pereira Jasminda | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:33 | |
| Lampeitl Öberg Jessica | 2024 Stockholm | 01:24:56 | |
| Copeland Anderson | 2023 Chicago | 01:25:34 | |
| Casati Stefania | 2023 Milan | 01:25:04 | |
| Bailey Sarah | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:39 | |
| Davis Aloura | 2024 Brisbane | 01:25:55 | |
| Gache Julie | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 New York | 01:23:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
