Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Klinkert Sjuul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Klinkert Sjuul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Klinkert Sjuul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Klinkert Sjuul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:50 | 41:16 to 39:26 | 35.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:14 | 05:40 to 04:26 | 24.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:45 | 05:15 to 04:30 | 14.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:31 | 04:47 to 04:16 | 10.1% |
| Rowing | 00:25 | 05:01 to 04:36 | 8.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 04:37 to 04:15 | 7.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:44 to 01:44 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Klinkert Sjuul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:17 | 00:00 | 04:23 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 03:17 | 04:21 +00:26 | 04:23 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 08:04 | 04:44 +00:00 | 08:44 -00:40 |
| Sled Push | 02:19 | 12:48 | 02:44 -00:25 | 13:28 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 15:07 | 05:08 +00:17 | 16:12 -01:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 20:32 | 04:36 +00:01 | 21:20 -00:48 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 25:09 | 05:06 +00:11 | 25:56 -00:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:15 | 30:26 | 04:55 +00:20 | 31:02 -00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 35:41 | 05:15 +00:07 | 35:57 -00:16 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 41:03 | 04:42 +00:19 | 41:12 -00:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 46:04 | 05:09 +00:06 | 45:54 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:44 | 51:19 | 02:04 -00:20 | 51:03 +00:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 53:03 | 05:07 +00:13 | 53:07 -00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:40 | 58:23 | 04:46 +00:54 | 58:14 +00:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:39 | 01:04:03 | 05:36 +01:03 | 01:03:00 +01:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:09 | 01:10:42 | 05:59 -00:50 | 01:08:36 +02:06 |
| Roxzone | 05:06 | 01:20:49 | 06:14 -01:08 | 01:20:49 |
Sjuul Klinkert delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event, ranking in the top 24% of all athletes and top 26% within his age group. His overall time was 01:20:49. While his running segments started impressively fast, with Running 1 being significantly faster than average, there was a noticeable decline in pace in subsequent runs. His total running time was 00:41:16, which is 00:20 slower than average, indicating that his strength might not be in running. Additionally, his performance in strength-based exercises was mixed, with exceptional results in exercises like the Wall Balls and Farmers Carry, yet showing room for improvement in others, such as Sandbag Lunges and Burpees Broad Jump. Overall, Sjuul's profile appears to lean more towards a hybrid athlete, with strengths in both running and strength exercises, albeit with a slight need for improvement in running endurance and pacing.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Nathan | 2024 London | 01:21:11 | |
| Mcinerney Eamonn | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:14 | |
| Morris Louis | 2023 Barcelona | 01:21:11 | |
| Choi Hoon | 2024 Incheon | 01:20:32 | |
| John Will | 2022 London | 01:20:30 | |
| Mathew Joel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:12 | |
| Mucher Markus | 2022 Wien | 01:21:08 | |
| Simons Russell | 2024 London | 01:20:19 | |
| Ballantyne Ian | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:58 | |
| Van Oijen Chris | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:21:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
