Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 947 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cyganek Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cyganek Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cyganek Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cyganek Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:30 | 10:57 to 08:27 | 61.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:36 | 06:47 to 06:11 | 14.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 04:00 to 03:37 | 9.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:16 | 07:16 to 07:00 | 6.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:53 to 02:40 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:51 to 04:46 | 2.1% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:12 to 48:12 | 0.0% |
| Cyganek Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:52 | 00:00 | 05:20 -00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 04:52 | 04:44 +00:07 | 05:20 -00:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 09:43 | 05:48 -00:24 | 10:04 -00:21 |
| Sled Push | 04:00 | 15:07 | 03:35 +00:25 | 15:52 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 06:06 | 19:07 | 06:27 -00:21 | 19:27 -00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 06:47 | 25:13 | 06:18 +00:29 | 25:54 -00:41 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 32:00 | 06:28 -00:21 | 32:12 -00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:16 | 38:07 | 07:11 +00:05 | 38:40 -00:33 |
| Running 5 | 06:14 | 45:23 | 06:44 -00:30 | 45:51 -00:28 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 51:37 | 05:15 -00:14 | 52:35 -00:58 |
| Running 6 | 06:12 | 56:38 | 06:30 -00:18 | 57:50 -01:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:53 | 01:02:50 | 02:39 +00:14 | 01:04:20 -01:30 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 01:05:43 | 06:32 -00:30 | 01:06:59 -01:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 01:11:45 | 06:40 -01:32 | 01:13:31 -01:46 |
| Running 8 | 07:17 | 01:16:53 | 07:48 -00:31 | 01:20:11 -03:18 |
| Wall Balls | 10:57 | 01:24:10 | 08:48 +02:09 | 01:27:59 -03:49 |
| Roxzone | 11:09 | 01:46:10 | 09:23 +01:46 | 01:46:10 |
Daniel's best running lap was 00:04:52, which was 00:17 faster than the average. He consistently performed well in the running segments, with all his running splits being faster than the average. His running profile seems to be a strength, as indicated by his total running time being faster than average.
Incorporating these strategies, specific exercises, and form corrections into his training routine will help Daniel improve his performance in the identified areas of improvement. With consistent training and focus on these areas, he can further enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Heuring Jace | 2024 Houston | 01:46:06 | |
| Magalhaes Luiz | 2024 New York | 01:45:46 | |
| Bateman David | 2023 Miami | 01:46:21 | |
| 蔺 建涛 | 2024 Beijing | 01:46:27 | |
| Escutia Segoviano Gabriel | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:46:10 | |
| Rawson Will | 2022 London | 01:46:40 | |
| Cirkin Aleksandr | 2023 London | 01:46:35 | |
| Müller Rene | 2023 Hannover | 01:46:21 | |
| Kotkowski Kamil | 2024 Poznan | 01:46:08 | |
| Storer Lee | 2023 Manchester | 01:46:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Karlsruhe | 02:09:55 | |
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:32:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
