Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lawrence Glenn's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lawrence Glenn's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lawrence Glenn's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lawrence Glenn's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 03:32 | 05:50 to 02:18 | 51.8% |
| Run Total | 02:23 | 47:38 to 45:15 | 35.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:40 | 07:42 to 07:02 | 9.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:11 | 06:02 to 05:51 | 2.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 05:32 to 05:30 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 03:06 to 03:05 | 0.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Lawrence Glenn | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:56 | 00:00 | 04:54 +01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 05:56 | 04:33 -00:03 | 04:54 +01:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:38 | 10:26 | 05:21 +00:17 | 09:27 +00:59 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 16:04 | 03:12 -00:06 | 14:48 +01:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 19:10 | 05:51 -00:02 | 18:00 +01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 24:59 | 05:29 -00:48 | 23:51 +01:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:48 | 29:40 | 05:50 -00:02 | 29:20 +00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 35:28 | 06:07 -00:05 | 35:10 +00:18 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 41:30 | 06:03 -00:03 | 41:17 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 47:30 | 05:00 -00:25 | 47:20 +00:10 |
| Running 6 | 06:00 | 52:05 | 05:53 +00:07 | 52:20 -00:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 05:50 | 58:05 | 02:23 +03:27 | 58:13 -00:08 |
| Running 7 | 06:06 | 01:03:55 | 05:51 +00:15 | 01:00:36 +03:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 01:10:01 | 05:42 -00:10 | 01:06:27 +03:34 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:15:33 | 06:41 -00:17 | 01:12:09 +03:24 |
| Wall Balls | 07:42 | 01:21:57 | 07:24 +00:18 | 01:18:50 +03:07 |
| Roxzone | 04:37 | 01:34:08 | 07:54 -03:17 | 01:34:08 |
Glenn's best running lap was 00:05:38, indicating that he had a strong burst of speed during that segment. However, his splits analysis reveals areas where he lost time compared to the average, such as Running 1, Running 2, Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, and Running 7.
By implementing these training strategies and techniques, Glenn Lawrence can improve his performance in future Hyrox races. It is important for him to focus on both his running and strength training to ensure a well-rounded and competitive performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Subramanian Vivek | 2023 Sydney | 01:34:29 | |
| Lee Jian Ler | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:33:57 | |
| Mullan Mark | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:33:57 | |
| Favela Kevin | 2021 Chicago | 01:33:50 | |
| Flinterman Ben | 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:22 | |
| Barry James | 2023 London | 01:33:40 | |
| Van Den Berg Evert | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:34:37 | |
| Crawford Caleb | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:34:01 | |
| Pugh Darrell | 2024 Manchester | 01:33:52 | |
| Weißflog Veit | 2018 Leipzig | 01:34:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 New York | 01:32:03 | |
| 2023 Stuttgart | 01:33:12 | |
| 2023 London | 01:28:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
