Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 955 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:31 (From 52:56 to 50:25) | 60.2% |
| BBJ | 01:37 (From 08:43 to 07:06) | 38.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 (From 06:36 to 06:33) | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:17 to 04:17) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:22 to 02:22) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 05:20 to 05:20) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:59 to 04:59) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:07 to 02:07) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 08:07 to 08:07) | 0.0% |
| Edmonson Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:01 | 00:00 | 05:21 -01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 04:01 | 04:45 -00:28 | 05:21 -01:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:47 | 08:18 | 05:53 -00:06 | 10:06 -01:48 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 14:05 | 03:36 -01:14 | 15:59 -01:54 |
| Running 3 | 06:19 | 16:27 | 06:27 -00:08 | 19:35 -03:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:20 | 22:46 | 06:21 -01:01 | 26:02 -03:16 |
| Running 4 | 06:10 | 28:06 | 06:28 -00:18 | 32:23 -04:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:43 | 34:16 | 07:12 +01:31 | 38:51 -04:35 |
| Running 5 | 06:52 | 42:59 | 06:47 +00:05 | 46:03 -03:04 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 49:51 | 05:16 -00:17 | 52:50 -02:59 |
| Running 6 | 06:54 | 54:50 | 06:32 +00:22 | 58:06 -03:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 01:01:44 | 02:40 -00:33 | 01:04:38 -02:54 |
| Running 7 | 07:12 | 01:03:51 | 06:32 +00:40 | 01:07:18 -03:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:36 | 01:11:03 | 06:44 -00:08 | 01:13:50 -02:47 |
| Running 8 | 09:44 | 01:17:39 | 07:55 +01:49 | 01:20:34 -02:55 |
| Wall Balls | 08:07 | 01:27:23 | 08:53 -00:46 | 01:28:29 -01:06 |
| Roxzone | 11:27 | 01:46:49 | 09:27 +02:00 | 01:46:49 |
Patrick Edmonson demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event. He placed in the top 47% of both overall athletes and in his age group. His performance highlighted his evident strength and endurance, as seen in his faster-than-average running times in the first four running segments. However, his overall running time was 53 seconds slower than average. This suggests that Patrick started the race quite fast but struggled to maintain this pace throughout the race. Accordingly, it is evident that Patrick has a more strength-focused profile as he performed well in events such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull, where he completed these segments faster than the average.
Patrick should consider the following strategies for better performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whitacre Kenneth | 2024 Dallas | 01:47:04 | |
| Spicer Bill | 2024 Anaheim | 01:46:22 | |
| Morales Rios Victor Antonio | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:47:11 | |
| Krug Raphael | 2022 Wien | 01:47:03 | |
| Oram Jason | 2024 Birmingham | 01:47:17 | |
| Mistry Dipesh | 2024 Manchester | 01:46:29 | |
| Ward Tom | 2022 Birmingham | 01:46:19 | |
| Tan Hong Jiun | 2023 Singapore | 01:47:08 | |
| Schmeiduch Jan | 2022 Essen | 01:46:43 | |
| Coleman Tommy | 2024 Dublin | 01:46:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Chicago Edmonson Patrick | 01:38:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Edmonson Patrick
