Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Quesnel Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Quesnel Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Quesnel Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Quesnel Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:58 | 42:02 to 39:04 | 59.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 05:26 to 04:25 | 20.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:45 | 05:07 to 04:22 | 15.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 04:23 to 04:12 | 3.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 01:58 to 01:52 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Quesnel Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:46 | 00:00 | 04:21 -01:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:56 | 02:46 | 04:21 -00:25 | 04:21 -01:35 |
| Running 2 | 09:09 | 06:42 | 04:42 +04:27 | 08:42 -02:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 15:51 | 02:42 -00:28 | 13:24 +02:27 |
| Running 3 | 04:53 | 18:05 | 05:05 -00:12 | 16:06 +01:59 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 22:58 | 04:32 -00:09 | 21:11 +01:47 |
| Running 4 | 04:48 | 27:21 | 05:04 -00:16 | 25:43 +01:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:26 | 32:09 | 04:47 +00:39 | 30:47 +01:22 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 37:35 | 05:12 -00:13 | 35:34 +02:01 |
| Rowing | 04:13 | 42:34 | 04:40 -00:27 | 40:46 +01:48 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 46:47 | 05:05 +00:13 | 45:26 +01:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 52:05 | 02:02 -00:04 | 50:31 +01:34 |
| Running 7 | 04:55 | 54:03 | 05:03 -00:08 | 52:33 +01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:07 | 58:58 | 04:40 +00:27 | 57:36 +01:22 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:04:05 | 05:32 -00:14 | 01:02:16 +01:49 |
| Wall Balls | 05:11 | 01:09:23 | 05:53 -00:42 | 01:07:48 +01:35 |
| Roxzone | 05:22 | 01:19:47 | 06:06 -00:44 | 01:19:47 |
Patrick Quesnel delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 161, placing him in the top 15% of athletes, and an impressive 8th in his age group, placing him in the top 7%. His overall time was 01:19:47. Analyzing his total running time of 00:42:02, which was 01:39 slower than average, suggests that Patrick has a more strength-oriented profile and should focus on enhancing his running performance. His starting pace was notably aggressive in Running 1, where he clocked a time 01:33 faster than the average, indicating a tendency to start too fast.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellis Andrew | 2023 London | 01:20:12 | |
| Toonen Stefan | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:19:29 | |
| Demirdji David | 2024 Paris | 01:19:30 | |
| Schumacher Thilo | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:20:00 | |
| Clery Joshua | 2024 Cape Town | 01:19:34 | |
| Scott Callum | 2024 Glasgow | 01:19:27 | |
| Oneill Josh | 2023 Barcelona | 01:19:28 | |
| Rauter Monier | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:38 | |
| Morrison Jonny | 2023 Melbourne | 01:19:32 | |
| Falzon Matthew | 2023 Melbourne | 01:19:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
