Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Klepatz Pit's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Klepatz Pit's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Klepatz Pit's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Klepatz Pit's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:19 | 42:38 to 41:19 | 45.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:02 | 05:48 to 04:46 | 35.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:20 | 06:18 to 05:58 | 11.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 05:07 to 04:55 | 6.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Klepatz Pit | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 04:24 | 04:25 -00:11 | 04:35 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 08:38 | 04:55 -00:05 | 09:00 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 13:28 | 02:51 -00:44 | 13:55 -00:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 15:35 | 05:21 +00:20 | 16:46 -01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 21:16 | 04:51 -00:16 | 22:07 -00:51 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 25:51 | 05:20 +00:11 | 26:58 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:07 | 31:22 | 05:14 -00:07 | 32:18 -00:56 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 36:29 | 05:30 +00:03 | 37:32 -01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 42:02 | 04:47 -00:13 | 43:02 -01:00 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 46:36 | 05:21 +00:01 | 47:49 -01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 51:58 | 02:09 -00:11 | 53:10 -01:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 53:56 | 05:20 -00:04 | 55:19 -01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:48 | 59:12 | 05:02 +00:46 | 01:00:39 -01:27 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:05:00 | 05:56 +00:09 | 01:05:41 -00:41 |
| Wall Balls | 06:18 | 01:11:05 | 06:25 -00:07 | 01:11:37 -00:32 |
| Roxzone | 07:30 | 01:24:45 | 06:43 +00:47 | 01:24:45 |
Pit Klepatz, in the category of HYROX, Age Group 35-39, delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Hamburg event. Despite falling slightly behind the average in total running time, he demonstrated significant strength in the Sled Push and Ski Erg segments, where he surpassed the average time by 44 and 11 seconds respectively. His performance in these strength-focused segments suggests a solid foundation in power and endurance training. However, there was a gradual decrease in running speed from the first to the fourth running segment, indicating a possible initial overexertion. This is an important aspect to consider for future pacing strategies.
Considering Pit's performance, adopting the following strategies may improve future race results:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcintyre Brent | 2023 Melbourne | 01:24:29 | |
| vernet anthony | 2024 Paris | 01:24:32 | |
| Palmers Brandon | 2024 Köln | 01:24:17 | |
| Ryan Daniel | 2022 London | 01:24:22 | |
| Drummond Lachlan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:54 | |
| Troskie Christiaan | 2024 Cape Town | 01:24:57 | |
| Modrak Patrick | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:24:43 | |
| Cole Tim | 2022 London | 01:25:08 | |
| Van Den Wijngaard Otto | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:40 | |
| Ramirez Rodrigo | 2024 Mexico City | 01:25:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
