Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Roberson Joe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Roberson Joe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Roberson Joe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Roberson Joe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:43 | 44:47 to 39:04 | 95.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:08 to 01:52 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:26 to 03:26 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:25 to 03:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Roberson Joe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:00 | 00:00 | 04:22 +01:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 06:00 | 04:21 -00:11 | 04:22 +01:38 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 10:10 | 04:42 +00:08 | 08:43 +01:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:09 | 15:00 | 02:43 -00:34 | 13:25 +01:35 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 17:09 | 05:05 +00:56 | 16:08 +01:01 |
| Sled Pull | 03:26 | 23:10 | 04:32 -01:06 | 21:13 +01:57 |
| Running 4 | 05:59 | 26:36 | 05:05 +00:54 | 25:45 +00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:51 | 32:35 | 04:47 -00:56 | 30:50 +01:45 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 36:26 | 05:13 +00:24 | 35:37 +00:49 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 42:03 | 04:40 -00:15 | 40:50 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 46:28 | 05:05 +00:24 | 45:30 +00:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 51:57 | 02:02 +00:06 | 50:35 +01:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 54:05 | 05:04 +00:16 | 52:37 +01:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:25 | 59:25 | 04:40 -01:15 | 57:41 +01:44 |
| Running 8 | 05:35 | 01:02:50 | 05:33 +00:02 | 01:02:21 +00:29 |
| Wall Balls | 04:51 | 01:08:25 | 05:54 -01:03 | 01:07:54 +00:31 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:19:53 | 06:05 +00:39 | 01:19:53 |
Pacing and Profile:
Joe's overall pacing during the race was well-maintained, with his total running time of 00:44:47 being 06:04 slower than the average. This indicates that Joe has a well-rounded profile, with a balance between running and strength exercises. However, to further improve his performance, he can focus on specific areas to gain an edge.
In conclusion, Joe Roberson displayed a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Madrid. By focusing on the identified areas for improvement, implementing specific training strategies and techniques, and incorporating race strategies, Joe can further enhance his performance in future races. With his dedication and determination, Joe has the potential to achieve even greater success in his fitness journey.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carter Ronan | 2022 New York | 01:19:52 | |
| Steventon John | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:02 | |
| Sheehan Alex | 2023 Sydney | 01:19:59 | |
| Kearley Trent | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:47 | |
| Majenka Robert | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:19:49 | |
| Mesquita Leonardo | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:19:36 | |
| González Soler David | 2022 Valencia | 01:19:47 | |
| Andrade Erick | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:19:54 | |
| Gunson Chris | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:35 | |
| Rebours Steven | 2024 Paris | 01:19:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Berlin | 01:06:42 | |
| 2024 Stockholm | 01:17:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
