Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Blanco Navas Mario Eduardo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Blanco Navas Mario Eduardo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Blanco Navas Mario Eduardo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Blanco Navas Mario Eduardo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:34 | 04:02 to 02:28 | 35.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:09 | 05:24 to 04:15 | 25.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:41 | 05:11 to 04:30 | 15.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:27 | 05:57 to 05:30 | 10.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 04:40 to 04:26 | 5.2% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:46 to 04:36 | 3.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:22 to 04:16 | 2.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:00 to 01:54 | 2.2% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:11 to 38:11 | 0.0% |
| Blanco Navas Mario Eduardo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:14 | 00:00 | 04:23 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 05:14 | 04:22 +00:00 | 04:23 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:26 | 09:36 | 04:44 -00:18 | 08:45 +00:51 |
| Sled Push | 04:02 | 14:02 | 02:44 +01:18 | 13:29 +00:33 |
| Running 3 | 04:45 | 18:04 | 05:08 -00:23 | 16:13 +01:51 |
| Sled Pull | 05:24 | 22:49 | 04:36 +00:48 | 21:21 +01:28 |
| Running 4 | 04:36 | 28:13 | 05:06 -00:30 | 25:57 +02:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:11 | 32:49 | 04:55 +00:16 | 31:03 +01:46 |
| Running 5 | 04:39 | 38:00 | 05:15 -00:36 | 35:58 +02:02 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 42:39 | 04:42 +00:04 | 41:13 +01:26 |
| Running 6 | 04:45 | 47:25 | 05:09 -00:24 | 45:55 +01:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 52:10 | 02:04 -00:04 | 51:04 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 04:41 | 54:10 | 05:07 -00:26 | 53:08 +01:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:40 | 58:51 | 04:46 -00:06 | 58:15 +00:36 |
| Running 8 | 05:08 | 01:03:31 | 05:36 -00:28 | 01:03:01 +00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 05:57 | 01:08:39 | 06:00 -00:03 | 01:08:37 +00:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:22 | 01:20:50 | 06:13 +00:09 | 01:20:50 |
Mario Eduardo Blanco Navas showed a commendable performance, placing in the top 23% overall and top 20% in his age group. His total running time was 02:33 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his Roxzone time was 00:13 slower than average, suggesting a need to improve transition times and overall fitness. Mario started the race slower than average but picked up the pace from the second running segment onwards, finishing each consecutive running segment faster than average. This suggests he has strong stamina and pacing skills.
Mario should consider starting the race at a faster pace since he has demonstrated the ability to maintain a steady speed throughout the race. Further, incorporating more strength-based training could help him perform better in the strength segments, thereby improving his overall rank. Finally, practicing transitions and focusing on quick recovery can help reduce the roxzone time, further improving his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Alen Junior Nelson Manuel | 2023 Barcelona | 01:20:49 | |
| Galloway Andrew | 2023 Melbourne | 01:20:36 | |
| Crawley Brendan | 2024 Dublin | 01:21:16 | |
| Glover Scott | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:46 | |
| Radigk Torben | 2019 Hamburg | 01:20:20 | |
| Blumberg Florian | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:21:19 | |
| Sanchez Del Campo Basagoiti Iñigo | 2024 Madrid | 01:20:44 | |
| Kröpelin Andreas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:21:03 | |
| Mccullum Rob | 2023 Chicago | 01:20:42 | |
| Hatton Joshua | 2023 London | 01:20:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Madrid | 01:34:31 | |
| 2023 Madrid | 01:53:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
